On 04/26/15 20:24, rysiek wrote: > Problem is -- and this very discussion shows it *very* well -- that even with > such restrictive license put on "works of opinion" (I do not subscribe to the > view that this distinction is relevant, but let's work with that), views > *are* > misunderstood. > > So, the license does not fix this problem, at all. > The impetus of the license isn't to increase understanding or decrease misunderstanding amongst readers of a work of opinion, but to stop the distribution of misrepresenting derivative works. I can't follow you when you start from a false predicate.
--
0xE1A91299.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
