2012/10/25 Sean McBride <s...@rogue-research.com>: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:40:46 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau said: > >>To make Xcode happy I had to use #include "libusb.h" instead of >>#include <libusb.h> for local headers. > > As I said, I had to do the same. Now, for my own development & testing, I'm > now trying something else... instead of building a libusbx library at all, > I'm just adding it's 10 or so source files directly to my app's Xcode > project. When I do, I hit more "" vs <> errors. Example core.c does: > > #include <config.h> > > yet it does: > > #include "libusbi.h" > > Is there some autotools reason that <config.h> must be <>-style instead of > ""-style? It seems to me libusb should include it's own files with "" not <>.
I don't think that <config.h> _must_ be <>-style. Just that it works with <>. It is strange that <> works for <config.h> but not for <libusbi.h> with Xcode. I don't know why config.h is special here. Regarding build using Xcode I added a config.h for Xcode. So it is now possible to build using Xcode without using ./configure first. Use my xcode branch at https://github.com/LudovicRousseau/libusbx/tree/xcode Bye -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
