On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:40:46 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau said: >To make Xcode happy I had to use #include "libusb.h" instead of >#include <libusb.h> for local headers.
As I said, I had to do the same. Now, for my own development & testing, I'm now trying something else... instead of building a libusbx library at all, I'm just adding it's 10 or so source files directly to my app's Xcode project. When I do, I hit more "" vs <> errors. Example core.c does: #include <config.h> yet it does: #include "libusbi.h" Is there some autotools reason that <config.h> must be <>-style instead of ""-style? It seems to me libusb should include it's own files with "" not <>. Cheers, -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng s...@rogue-research.com Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
