On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 13:44 +1000, David wrote: > > The idea that human have a "reasonable track record" is laughable - > > they kill and maim tens of thousands of each other each year. > The absolute number is pretty meaningless. The number of accidents > per vehicle-Km would be better, and even that varies according to the > type of journey (expressways, suburban, rural, etc), type of > accident, and other factors.
Seriously? The detail really doesn't matter. Human error in human- driven vehicles kills thousands every year. Pretty sure the relatives of those killed on expressways don't feel that much better or worse than the relatives of those killed on rural byways. > > If machines had the same track record, we wouldn't let them any > > where near the roads. In fact they have a much better track record, > > and we still don't let them drive. > I dispute that. We have no idea what the failure-rate would be if > all vehicles had Tesla-type technology. Not sure what you are disputing - that they have a better track record or that we don;t let them drive? Both are as far as I know, true statements. All we need is for driver-assisted or driverless vehicles to be a tiny bit better overall than human drivers, and we already have a huge win. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([email protected]) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer http://twitter.com/kauer389 GPG fingerprint: 8D08 9CAA 649A AFEF E862 062A 2E97 42D4 A2A0 616D Old fingerprint: A0CD 28F0 10BE FC21 C57C 67C1 19A6 83A4 9B0B 1D75 _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
