In the last mail Matthew Wilcox said: > Yes, this is normal; LDRs have a 1 cycle delay if the register is used > immediately. Last I heard; GCC did not reorder instructions to take > advantage of this. Q1: Where's the ARMLinux mailing list archive? IIRC, when I was looking at the ARM gcc backend about a month ago I found no code to make this optimisation. I think I mentioned that here. Is it likely to produce > 1% speed increase? Nick unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Instructions timing christophe leroy
- Re: Instructions timing Philip Blundell
- Re: Instructions timing christophe leroy
- Re: Instructions timing Matthew Wilcox
- Re: Instructions timing Philip Blundell
- Re: Instructions timing Nicholas Clark
- Re: Instructions timing Philip Blundell
- Re: Instructions timing Matthew Wilcox
- Re: Instructions timing Russell King - ARM Linux Admin
- Re: Instructions timing Deborah Wallach
- Re: Instructions timing Russell King - ARM Linux Admin
- Re: Instructions timing Deborah Wallach
- Re: Instructions timing Philip Blundell
- Re: Instructions timi... Russell King - ARM Linux Admin
- Re: Instructions ... Matthew Wilcox
- Re: Instructi... Scott Bambrough
