> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 19:43:27 -0600 > From: Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ?) > > Hmmm, then why not just implement token ring? One should probably go look at the token recovery algorithm first. I assume that the token would be lost (and token recovery invoked) much more often in a wireless network than in your typical token ring network. (I forget how token recovery works, but it probably takes some time.) -tjs
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Robert McGwier
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Robin Gilks
- 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem ove... Richard Stearn
- RE: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Michael Anderson
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Geoff Blake
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Greg Maxwell
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Nate Bargmann
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Tim Salo
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Ivo Simicevic
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Kazuhiko Oho
- Re: media access (was 10Mbit @ 10GHZ) Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Ivo Simicevic
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux soundmodem... Richard Stearn
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Greg Maxwell
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Thomas Sailer
