Jens David wrote: > As I said some weeks ago, we *really* ought to design a new mac protocol > for this kind of stuff. We could use syncronization preambles to help > clock recovery a bit and integrate FEC negotiation. That way, we could > support > those more-complicated modulation schemes on half duplex (user access) > channels. Speaking of high-speed packet, has anyone looked into altering an 2ghz ISM band DS spread-spectrum 802.11 wireless ethernet device into a HAM band (10GHz?) and increasing it's output power?
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Nate Bargmann
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Tim Salo
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Ivo Simicevic
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Kazuhiko Oho
- Re: media access (was 10Mbit @ 10... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Ivo Simicevic
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Richard Stearn
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Greg Maxwell
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Thomas Sailer
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Thomas Sailer
- How about, LINUX soundmodem at 9600 baud ? John Mock
