On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Ivo Simicevic wrote: > Have you checked IEEE 802.11 standard for wireless networks? > It solves problems you have noted. Why reinventing the wheel ?? :-)) Maybe because it's an entirely different wheel. 802.11 MAC with signal metering could form the basis for a coordinated channel access algorithm, but in itself it does not prevent you from colliding with a station you do not hear. It may shorten the collision, but unless you use massive redundancy the whole packet will still be destroyed, so it does not solve the problem. Neither does it allow for adaptive modulation in the presence of qrm. I'm not saying it's no good, just that a lot of problems remain. Kai
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Geoff Blake
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Greg Maxwell
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Nate Bargmann
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Tim Salo
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Ivo Simicevic
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Kazuhiko Oho
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Ivo Simicevic
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sou... Richard Stearn
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Greg Maxwell
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Thomas Sailer
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Thomas Sailer
- How about, LINUX soundmodem at 9600 baud ? John Mock
