On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:26:57AM +0100, Kai Schulte wrote: > > That means the best idea would be some kind of distributed algorithm > that groups stations accordingly, maybe based on signal strength > measurements. One flaw of such a system would be that "everyone > else" is required to remain silent while the signal of a given > station is being monitored. Propagating the information who > should transmit a test signal at what time is not trivial, > especially if we also consider asymmetric links. > > Any ideas anyone? > > Kai > > Have you checked IEEE 802.11 standard for wireless networks? It solves problems you have noted. Why reinventing the wheel ?? :-)) GL Ivo.
- 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux sound... Richard Stearn
- RE: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Michael Anderson
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Geoff Blake
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Greg Maxwell
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Nate Bargmann
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Tim Salo
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Ivo Simicevic
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Kazuhiko Oho
- Re: media access (was 10Mbit @ ... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Richard Stearn
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Kai Schulte
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Ivo Simicevic
- Re: 10Mbit @ 10GHZ (was linux s... Richard Stearn
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud... Greg Maxwell
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Thomas Sailer
- Re: linux soundmodem over 9600 baud ? Thomas Sailer
- How about, LINUX soundmodem at 9600 baud ? John Mock
