At 09:01 99/12/3 +0100, you wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:26:57AM +0100, Kai Schulte wrote:
> > 
> > That means the best idea would be some kind of distributed algorithm
> > that groups stations accordingly, maybe based on signal strength
> > measurements.  One flaw of such a system would be that "everyone
> > else" is required to remain silent while the signal of a given
> > station is being monitored.  Propagating the information who
> > should transmit a test signal at what time is not trivial,
> > especially if we also consider asymmetric links.
> > 
> > Any ideas anyone?
> > 
> > Kai
> > 
> > 
> 
> Have you checked IEEE 802.11 standard for wireless networks? 
> It solves problems you have noted.  Why reinventing the wheel ?? :-))
> 
> GL
> 
> Ivo.

        and also check http://www.drug.prug.or.jp/. drug means Digital Radio User's
        Group :)

--
Kazuhiko Oho - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to