On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 11:43:53PM +0000, Richard Adams wrote: > > Yes it is, for the simple reason, redhat-6.x uses kernels in the 2.2.xx > > range. Rh 6.x means 6.0 and 6.1. > > Its as easy as that. > > Don't you also need libc6.1 (glibc2.1) for the new tools? > That probably means RH6.1, not 6.0. The mentioned packages compile and work just fine on RH6.0. The binary rpm's I'm not 100% about but compiling from the source at least is definitely ok. On RH6.1 the binary rpm's is the way to go. -- Tomi Manninen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OH2BNS AX.25: [EMAIL PROTECTED] KP20ME04 Amprnet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Richard . Talbot
- Re: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Brian
- RE: RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Hast, Chuck
- RE: RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Richard Adams
- RE: RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Tomi Manninen
- RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 john Buxton
- RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Tomi Manninen
- RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 john Buxton
- RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Richard Adams
- Re: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Hamish Moffatt
- RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Tomi Manninen
- RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Peter Hallgarten
- Re: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Costas Krallis
- RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 john Buxton
- RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Robert McGwier
- RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Gregory Maxwell
- Re: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Peter Grace
- RE: RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Hast, Chuck
- RE: RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Costas Krallis
- Re: RE: RE: AX25 and Redhat 6.1 Richard . Talbot
