Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Outlook express

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

* Kingsly John [linux-india] <26/06/01 16:11 +0530>:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> 
>  |Mozilla does a pretty good job with tables, IMO.  Netscape is, on the whole,
>  |a bit more finicky about the structure of a table - malformated tables which
>  |are rendered by IE are not rendered at all by netscape.
> 
> This seems to be a major *plus* for IE... it accepts my poor-to-bad html
> skills and still renders the page! (netscape would probably blank or
> crash!)
 
You mean accepting non-standard and poor html is a bonus for IE?

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian  <-->  mallet <at> efn <dot> org
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin


_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help