Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Outlook express

[Kingsly John]

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:

 |I would consider it a bonus because in the real world most HTML is made
 |by hand and there is always human error to be considered. It wasnt
 |without reason that browsers are made to accept corrupt HTML as valid.

Yes and I would *love* to write a Kernel modules for all my hardware by
myself in Plain English ! 

But it's not the done thing... just because something can understand
syntactically wrong language doesn't make it good! Why do you need  w3c
and stuff if browsers are to be super smart and do guess what the user
wants it to do ?? 

I remember IE3.x had a total disregard for the mime-type as sent by the
server and did as it pleased with the data that was sent based on filename
extensions!!

Kingsly


_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help