On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: |* Kingsly John [linux-india] <26/06/01 16:11 +0530>: |> This seems to be a major *plus* for IE... it accepts my poor-to-bad html |> skills and still renders the page! (netscape would probably blank or |> crash!) | |You mean accepting non-standard and poor html is a bonus for IE? That is where all browser threads seem to lead... "IE renders bad html... netscape barfs at me... so I like IE !" If you write quality code... both IE and netscape would give the same result and netscape will give you the added bonus of security Kingsly _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Outlook... Differentiated Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd.,
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Shridhar Daithankar
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Kingsly John
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Kingsly John
- Re: [LIH] Netscape v... Shridhar Daithankar
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Mithun Bhattacharya
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Kingsly John
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [LIH] Netscape v... Shridhar Daithankar
- Re: [LIH] Netscape v... Kingsly John
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Mithun Bhattacharya
- Re: [LIH] Netscape v... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Shridhar Daithankar
- Re: [LIH] Netscape v... Mithun Bhattacharya
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Kingsly John
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Mithun Bhattacharya
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Mario da Costa
- Re: [LIH] Netscape v... Shridhar Daithankar
- Re: [LIH] Netscape vs Ou... Differentiated Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd.,
- Re: [LIH] Netscape v... Suresh Ramasubramanian
