Linux-Misc Digest #58, Volume #21                Fri, 16 Jul 99 23:13:07 EDT

Contents:
  Re: logging in is very slow (Paul Gallagher)
  Re: How to see dos-hidden-files? (Paul Gallagher)
  Re: StarOffice and Java?  Yikes, it doesn't work! (Reinhard Karcher)
  IP Masquerading - Can't use Host names only IP address ("Spotillius Maximus aka 
\"Spot\"")
  Method to scan hard disks ("Anthony")
  Re: Did you switch from Windows to Linux? (Todd Knarr)
  Re: Shortcomings of Linux? (William Burrow)
  Re: Does Linux support 'sar'? ("Donald E. Stidwell")
  Re: [vesafb] framebuffer wont work for me... :( (William Burrow)
  eth1 - Delaying Initialization??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: OVER 18 ONLY! 20330 (Cameron L. Spitzer)
  Adding users via WEB (Darren F.)
  Re: IP Masquerading - Can't use Host names only IP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  How to increase shared memory? (Anand Surelia)
  Re: Solving the 1024 cylinder LILO problem (Cameron L. Spitzer)
  Re: Can't run executables (yes I use ./) (Frederic L. W. Meunier)
  Re: Memory hogging, and dpms (Mookie D.)
  Re: IP Masquerading - Can't use Host names only IP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: IP Masquerading - Can't use Host names only IP address ("Spotillius Maximus aka 
\"Spot\"")
  Re: samba moved to a subnet HELLLLLLLPPPPP!!!!!!!!!  #$^(*#$&#& (Mark Post)
  Re: VMWARE floppy boot problem (Jeff Goodman)
  Re: HELP PLEASE!!! gtk and imlib (Frederic L. W. Meunier)
  Re: Did you switch from Windows to Linux? (George Mitchell)
  Re: rlogin without password ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Performance as a Inter/Intranet database application server? (jgrain)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: logging in is very slow
From: Paul Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16 Jul 1999 19:49:56 -0400

scable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm running RH6.0  Frequently (about one in four times) when I power up
> my machine and log in under my personal account, getting from the little
> login window to a full desktop takes a long time -- as much as five
> minutes.  I give it my name and password; the window goes away leaving
> only the RH logo on the screen; and then it just sits there for several
> minutes before anything else comes up. 
[...snipped...]

I think it's GNOME; this happens to me every now and then. Here's what
I do:

     Do a [CTRL]+[ALT]+[Backspace]

This will kill your X session and put you back to your login screen.

     Now, type [CTRL]+[ALT]+[F1]

You'll go to a "virtual console." Log in to your account (user
account, if that's where it's happening) with your name and password.

Now, type

     rm core .Xauthority .ICEauthority

Now, logout (type logout)

     Then, type [CTRL]+[ALT]+[F7]

and you'll return to the your graphical login screen.

Log in as yourself and everything should run smoothly.

As I understand it -- moderately, that is -- .Xauthority or
.ICEauthority is causing the problem.

(In fact, before I came across this tip, I'd resigned myself to simply
using KDE, but this works well with the GNOME troubles.)

Hope it helps.

P

================
ICQ: 16556555


------------------------------

Subject: Re: How to see dos-hidden-files?
From: Paul Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16 Jul 1999 19:55:25 -0400

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Dear all

[...snipped...]

> Does anybody have a clue how to make those files visible to linux!
> Thanks
> 

Try ls -al, which will show you all the files in a "long listing"
format. Actually, ls has quite a few options; type "man ls" (no
quotes) to read more. To scroll through the "man page," use the
spacebar; to move back, use the [B] key, and to quit, use the [Q] key.


P

===============
ICQ: 16556555

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Reinhard Karcher)
Date: 14 Jul 99 21:05:36 GMT
Subject: Re: StarOffice and Java?  Yikes, it doesn't work!

Mark Ricketts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Hi I'm new to Linux, am using SuSE 6.1 and am having some problems=20
>with StarOffice 5.1 and Java support when I'm trying to load certain=20
>web pages. I get a message telling me that Java support is not=20
>available.  Now I've installed Javarunt or Java v1.1.7 that came with=20
>my Linux distribution but I still get these errors.
>I've looked at the settings by following menu choices=20
>"Tools.....Options........Browser......Other".   In the "Other" dialog=20
>it is showing that all of my Java support is enabled, but there is=20
>nothing in the box that is asking for the classpath. What should I be=20
>looking in terms of a path to put in the Java Classpath? Is StarOffice=20
>looking for Java's include files or what? Could someone help me out=20
>with this? Thanks in advance.

Hi Mark,
look into the readme. Do with classes.zip that, what it suggest.
I had the same message (SuSE 6.0) and disapeared after that
procedure.

Reinhard





------------------------------

From: "Spotillius Maximus aka \"Spot\"" <*****@ix.netcom.com>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install,redhat.config
Subject: IP Masquerading - Can't use Host names only IP address
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 20:53:33 -0400

I got IP Masquerading working fairly easy.  The Howto's recommended trying
an IP address to see if it work, and it does.  But, when I try an internet
site with a host name it won't connect.  The other machine connected to my
Linux box is using Win98.  This may be just a simple setting?  I'm not sure
how to correct this problem.  I'm assuming it has something to do with the
firewall setting when you activate IP Masquerading?  Thanks in advance for
all the help.


                                                        Ed



------------------------------

From: "Anthony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Method to scan hard disks
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 08:59:17 +0800

July 17, 1999

I am a new user in SuSe.

Please advise the method to scan hard disks.

Best regards,

Anthony Cheung



------------------------------

From: Todd Knarr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Did you switch from Windows to Linux?
Date: 17 Jul 1999 00:57:21 GMT

John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are those games linux versions or do you use an emulator?  I knew doom
> could be played in linux but had no idea that Civilization Call to Power
> could.

Quake2 and Civ:CTP are both native Linux programs in their Linux
versions.

Interesting point: I didn't order my Linux version of Q2 over the net.
I got it off the shelf at Babbage's. There were 3 more copies on the
shelf. We're making progress.

-- 
Collin was right. Never give a virus a missile launcher.
                                -- Erk, Reality Check #8

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Burrow)
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Shortcomings of Linux?
Date: 17 Jul 1999 00:57:31 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Fri, 16 Jul 1999 17:58:20 GMT,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is this guy right on the money regarding the mentioned shortcomings
>of Linux?

Ahh, very troll like posting, but it is after all only one man's
opinion, and he is certainly entitled to it.  Sounds like BSD sour
grapes.  The BSD stack certainly has years of work behind it, but Linux
is maturing day by day and was the first with a kernel IPv6 implentation,
that I am aware of.  

>> For the last few years Microsoft has been trying to push
>> their own ideas and strategies through IETF as official

The MS bogeyman raises its ugly head.  Is BSD going to have all the
answers to the that problem?

>> Linux is Posix-based, with a small set of system calls,
>> compared to the extremely convoluted Windows. The Linux API
>> can easily be emulated by BSD operating systems. NetBSD
>> does, as a matter of fact, i.e. many "Linux applications"
>> will also work with NetBSD (at full speed). The reason

FreeBSD and OpenBSD also.  I can remember back to when DOSemu and Wine
were starting up and people were asking:  ``If Linux is so great, why
does it need to emulate other OSes?''  Lets not gloat too much by
turning this snide comment on its head.... ;)

Afterall, if Linux lives on only as a ``common Unix,'' not all was lost.


-- 
William Burrow  --  New Brunswick, Canada             o
Copyright 1999 William Burrow                     ~  /\
                                                ~  ()>()

------------------------------

From: "Donald E. Stidwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Does Linux support 'sar'?
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 01:12:40 GMT

Robert Komar wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> : Is there a 'sar' like program on Linux?
> : 'sar' is System Activity Report
> : It gets system information such as
> : swap, memory, paging, queues, cpu usage, etc.
>
> Try ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/status/sysstat-1.2.tar.gz
> I've never seen an official version of sar in action, but this
> clone is probably something like what you're looking for.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob Komar

There's also a little tonkle called "atsar" for Linux. I saw it on the
web somewhere (and actually downloaded it, but wound up deleting it).
Sorry I don't remember the URL, but I'm sure a search engine will find
it or a search on deja.com.

Don


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Burrow)
Subject: Re: [vesafb] framebuffer wont work for me... :(
Date: 17 Jul 1999 01:03:08 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Fri, 16 Jul 1999 01:28:36 GMT,
deny all <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I've got the framebuffers running on RH5.2 with an ATI Rage128.
>I may have misunderstood your problems, but have you actually created
>/dev/fb0
>mknod /dev/fb0 c 29 0        (If I remember correctly)
>This link told me everything I needed to know regarding the installation
>http://www.uno.edu/~adamico/banshee/

Once you got framebuffers going, how did you deal with X?  Or do you?


-- 
William Burrow  --  New Brunswick, Canada             o
Copyright 1999 William Burrow                     ~  /\
                                                ~  ()>()

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: eth1 - Delaying Initialization???
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 01:12:03 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have a Linux (2.0.36) server running samba, which works great, but I
am now trying to add another network card and run mars_nwe over that
interface, but when i try to add it, it says 'Delaying Initialization.'
 I don't have an IP address for it, but do I really need one if it's
only going to be using IPX???  Any suggestions/pointers would be greatly
appreciated.

--
Morgan Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cameron L. Spitzer)
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.lynx,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Re: OVER 18 ONLY! 20330
Date: 17 Jul 1999 01:38:25 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>ADULTS ONLY!
>
>Click the link below:
>
>http://207.240.225.250/

Complain to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (sexbabes.nu).
Call BBNplanet at 1-800-632-7638 and ask them why their abuse
desk is not working.  Read them the IP number.
Eventually they will get off their arses and disconnect these
spam bags.


Cameron



------------------------------

From: Darren F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Adding users via WEB
Date: 17 Jul 1999 01:31:05 GMT

  I want to set up a POP server and allow a user to fill in a Web-based 
form to create his/her own POP account on my Linux box.
  I can not find any information on doing something like this, or even how 
to give a user both telnet and adduser capabilities.
  So, any information and/or direction would be greatly appreciated.
  Thanks

==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install,redhat.config
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading - Can't use Host names only IP address
Date: 17 Jul 1999 01:32:29 GMT

Spotillius Maximus aka \"Spot\" wrote:
> 
> I got IP Masquerading working fairly easy.  The Howto's recommended trying
> an IP address to see if it work, and it does.  But, when I try an internet
> site with a host name it won't connect.  The other machine connected to my
> Linux box is using Win98.  This may be just a simple setting?  I'm not sure
> how to correct this problem.  I'm assuming it has something to do with the
> firewall setting when you activate IP Masquerading?  Thanks in advance for
> all the help.

Try putting the IP address of your DNS server(s) into /etc/resolv.conf
You have to go to a DNS server to resolve a name to a number.

Your /etc/resolv.conf should look something like this:
==========================================
search your_local_network_domain_name_here
nameserver 297.396.1.2
nameserver 297.396.1.3
==========================================
The addresses supplied here are obvious fakes (>254)
but you get the idea...

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 17:41:02 -0700
From: Anand Surelia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to increase shared memory?

Hi,
Thanks for taking time out to read this. Here is my problem:
I am using a database called Postgres. There are options in it which
will allow me to give it more shared memory to make it run faster.
However when I try that it fails saying it couldn't get enough shared
memory. The Postgres people say that I've to configure my system to
increase the shared memory segments available. How can I do that? How
can I find how much shared memory is available in my system (Red Hat
Linux -2.2.2)?
I appreciate your help.
Thanks,
-- Anand.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cameron L. Spitzer)
Subject: Re: Solving the 1024 cylinder LILO problem
Date: 17 Jul 1999 01:34:36 GMT

In article <7mmnpl$ler$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Villy Kruse wrote:
>One wonders what makes it so "hard" to fit a few Mb big /boot partition
>entirely within the first 1024 cylinders, when just one or two cylinders
>would be enough for that partition.

For many people, the first 1024 cylinders are occupied by
a Microsoft product which was factory installed by a
computer manufacturer, and it will cost them lots of time
and money if they break that installation.
Since they are not experts at the ever-changing world of
BIOS revisions and patches, and can't control the interactions
between their BIOS and the Microsoft Hardware Wizerd,
they dare not attempt to modify their installations and cannot
reinstall.  You can disparage these people if you like, but this
is the real-world environment to which the freeware community
must adapt.

For many more, it was not revealed to them before they partitioned
their drive for Linux that LILO could not be installed if
/dev/hda1 was more than 1023 cylinders.  All the popular Linux
distributions are broken in this way.  The "disk druid" and its
counterparts need to be able to deal with this, and the file systems
need some way to reliably create a file in the BIOS-accessible
cylinders.  Until that happens, there is something Microsoft
does better than we do, besides marketing.

Lilo and xf86config are the hardest part of installing Linux,
because they happen to newcomers.


>If this is not possible you can still
>put the contents of the /boot partition into a mounted fat32 or fat16
>file system, run lilo, and the lilo loader will be happy.

Not if the fat32 FS occupies non-BIOS-accessible cylinders.

Cameron



------------------------------

From: Frederic L. W. Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Can't run executables (yes I use ./)
Date: 17 Jul 1999 02:14:53 GMT

Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This may be a problem with your libraries:
>Check ldd executable_name, if all reqired libs are present on your system.
Hmm, but if they're not on the system a message like
can't load or locate foo.so.0 isn't shown?

-- 
Frederic L. W. Meunier = Niteroi, RJ - Brazil = Tel: +55-21-620-7173
Contact: fredlwm@{olympiquedemarseille.org,urbi.com.br} = IRC: _19751127
[root@marseille /tmp]# f{l,r}ames;java*;HTML_mail;SPAM > /dev/null

------------------------------

From: Mookie D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Memory hogging, and dpms
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 02:10:23 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mookie D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for your explanation of this.  What is the buffers memory
being
> > used for?  Is that reclaimed automatically also?
> > I've got a memory-intensive program I'm developing and need to
> > understand.  Recently discovered vmstat as a good way to see when
> > thrashing starts, but could also use any tips people have on this.
>
> it uses it for buffers.  compare the time it takes to start something
> big like xemacs to the second time you start it; if you have a
reasonable
> amount of memory it should start almost immed. (well, maybe xemacs is
> a poor example).  If your system is 'thrashing' then you need more
> RAM for what you are trying to do.  If you mean that you see your swap
> being used, that's a good thing.

OK... under what circumstances can running apps claim that buffer
memory?  I.e., if the program I'm developing gets to the point where
there's no cache left, will it get access to the buffers or not?

--Mook


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install,redhat.config
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading - Can't use Host names only IP address
Date: 17 Jul 1999 02:23:52 GMT

>From your description I think the following is true"
  Linux box
    is IPMasq host
    IPaddr name works on local browser
  Win98 box
    depends on Linux box for internet access
    IPaddr number works on local browser
    IPaddr name does not
If this is true then:
  Do you have the DNS setup on the Win98 box? 
  It also has to know where to resolve numbers to names.
Or what's more likely:
  I'm completely confused at this point :-)

Spotillius Maximus aka \"Spot\" wrote:
> 
> I have my /etc/resolv.conf set that way.  It connects to the internet fine.
> What's happening is that when I type in an IP address of a site on the Win98
> machine it will go there no problem, but, if I type in
> http://www.pricewatch.com  it will not connect to it.  This is using
> Internet Explorer on the other box.  The Howto said to try the IP address
> first for the test, so there must be a solution to this?  Thanks.
> 
> Ed
> 
> >Try putting the IP address of your DNS server(s) into /etc/resolv.conf
> >You have to go to a DNS server to resolve a name to a number.
> >
> >Your /etc/resolv.conf should look something like this:
> >------------------------------------------
> >search your_local_network_domain_name_here
> >nameserver 297.396.1.2
> >nameserver 297.396.1.3
> >------------------------------------------
> >The addresses supplied here are obvious fakes (>254)
> >but you get the idea...

------------------------------

From: "Spotillius Maximus aka \"Spot\"" <*****@ix.netcom.com>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install,redhat.config
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading - Can't use Host names only IP address
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 21:50:25 -0400

I have my /etc/resolv.conf set that way.  It connects to the internet fine.
What's happening is that when I type in an IP address of a site on the Win98
machine it will go there no problem, but, if I type in
http://www.pricewatch.com  it will not connect to it.  This is using
Internet Explorer on the other box.  The Howto said to try the IP address
first for the test, so there must be a solution to this?  Thanks.


Ed


>Try putting the IP address of your DNS server(s) into /etc/resolv.conf
>You have to go to a DNS server to resolve a name to a number.
>
>Your /etc/resolv.conf should look something like this:
>------------------------------------------
>search your_local_network_domain_name_here
>nameserver 297.396.1.2
>nameserver 297.396.1.3
>------------------------------------------
>The addresses supplied here are obvious fakes (>254)
>but you get the idea...



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Post)
Subject: Re: samba moved to a subnet HELLLLLLLPPPPP!!!!!!!!!  #$^(*#$&#&
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 01:23:08 GMT

On Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:43:38 -0400, John Assalone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>I had a perfectly working linux samba server that i moved behind a load
>balancer/firewall last night (don't ask why).
-snip-
>None of the NT workstations on the external network can see the samba
>server or find it through from find computer. This is very important...

Windows machines need a WINS server to be able to see machines on a
different subnet.  You _could_ turn on the WINS server part of Samba,
and then update the workstations' TCP/IP parameters to point to the
Samba box as the WINS server.  If you already have a WINS server,
update its parameters so that it knows the IP address of the Samba
machine.

To send me email, replace 'nospam' with 'home'.

------------------------------

From: Jeff Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: VMWARE floppy boot problem
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 19:08:29 -0700

I didn't realize that the VM BIOS even supported booting from diskette,
but I checked the BIOS option and it looked like it should work - so I
tried a DOS 6.22 diskette, and it booted fine.

When you attempt to boot, does the diskette light turn on?  If not, you
may want to check the VM BIOS "Boot" option.  For the record - I'm
running VMWare for Linux (registered, not eval), and the guest is NT4,
running from a "raw disk" partition, not a virtual disk.

Jeff

Eric Hazen wrote:
> 
> I've just installed VMWARE 1.02 eval version on my RedHat 6.0 system.
> When I "power on" a VM with a DOS 6 boot floppy it just gives the
> "non system disk..." message.  Same results with various other dos
> versions and the Win NT 4.0 boot disk.
> 
> Anyone else have a similar problem?
> 
> --
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |  Eric Hazen | Phone: 617/353-4117 | Fax: 617/353-3331 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> |  Boston University Physics Dept   | http://ohm.bu.edu/~hazen         |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------

From: Frederic L. W. Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP PLEASE!!! gtk and imlib
Date: 17 Jul 1999 02:08:39 GMT

Guillermo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>/convert: No such file or directory
Install ImageMagick! Search for it at http://freshmeat.net/

-- 
Frederic L. W. Meunier = Niteroi, RJ - Brazil = Tel: +55-21-620-7173
Contact: fredlwm@{olympiquedemarseille.org,urbi.com.br} = IRC: _19751127
[root@marseille /tmp]# f{l,r}ames;java*;HTML_mail;SPAM > /dev/null

------------------------------

From: George Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Did you switch from Windows to Linux?
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 19:13:15 -0700

I am using removable boot disks in order to try to find the best of both
worlds at this point.

LINUX - The best operating system in the world in search of a few good
applications.
Windows - The best collection of applications in the world in search of a good
operating system.

George Mitchell


Brad Grimes wrote:

> If so, I'm writing a magazine article about operating systems and I'd like
> to hear from you. Drop me a line at:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rlogin without password
Date: 17 Jul 1999 01:13:41 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> On my SGI I can specify which users can log into an account on another
> machine without using a password by entering a user name in a .rhosts
> file.
> 
> How can that be done in Linux???
> 
> Thank you,
> Clarence Donath
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

I use .rhosts all the time in Linux, works like a charm.
I 'chmod 600 .rhosts'.
Make sure your hosts.allow and hosts.deny are correct...

------------------------------

From: jgrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Performance as a Inter/Intranet database application server?
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 04:10:08 +0100

What would be the wisest choices a one man band would make in order to
develop database applications over Wide Area networks now and in the
future?

Components required would include:

Operating System
Web Server
Database
Authoring Tools
Programming Languages

Ideally this should be directed towards the complete novice through to
guru level, time spent with software is experience, using the same tools
for a long period of time would be a smart move if you ask me, although
I may be wrong.

Thanking you in advance for guidance shared.


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to