Linux-Misc Digest #113, Volume #28 Fri, 15 Jun 01 09:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: What to use to write my thesis? (Giuseppe Bilotta)
turning a pentium into a vt100! (Massimiliano Caovilla)
XChat 1.7.7-1 problem (Roger Lindmark)
Re: acces to log files as nonroot (Jean-David Beyer)
Re: Enabling /dev/dsp for RW perms during telnet session ("Sinistar")
Two identical HDUs, but Linux disaggrees (Mea Culpa)
Re: Screen not responding (Robert Heller)
Re: HELP: Mouse broken on Mandrake 8.0 (Robert Davies)
Re: I want the numlock on! (Yvan Loranger)
Re: 2.4.2 Kernel Compiling Problem ("Gene Heskett")
Re: Two identical HDUs, but Linux disaggrees ("Eric")
Re: Shared library path. (Michael Heiming)
Re: Shared library path. (Michael Heiming)
Re: OpenLDAP question (Alex Page)
Novit� - News ("Daniel")
Re: What to use to write my thesis? (Edwin Johnson)
Tango2000 client error ("Oliver Schalch")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Giuseppe Bilotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.apps.word-proc,comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: What to use to write my thesis?
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:12:01 GMT
Scott Pakin wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> > The program you'll choose to use heavily depends on various factors.
> >
> > Factor 1: philosophy.
> >
> > First of all, you must decide if you want to use a wordprocessor (and
> > this does not mean necessarily Word) or a typesetting program. The
> > difference in quality between a wordprocessor output and a typesetter
> > output is enormous.
>
> I'd say that word processor vs. typesetting program is *the* key issue
> for most of the people I know who love one of LaTeX/Word and hate the
> other. I'd disagree about this being due primarily to the difference
> in quality, but rather to the difference in how one thinks about text.
>
> In a typesetting program, you're forced to think in terms of the
> structure of your document (this is a chapter heading; this is a
> paragraph; this is a list).
Wrong. Proof is, there is *nothing* about structure in plain TeX.
> In a word processor, you *can* think
> about document structure -- using style sheets -- but it takes
> discipline to do this consistently and most users prefer to "format by
> finger-painting" (I'll make this large and bold; I'll press <Enter>
> twice after this; I'll type increasing numbers before each of these).
Again, this is just a matter of habit. I, for one, have always used
styles in my WordPerfect documents.
> This brings me to my next point:
>
> > Factor 2: ease of use.
>
> It's easier to get started with a word processor and easier to dash
> off quick, throwaway documents.
This does not depend on the fact that it's a wordprocessor, but on the
fact that all wordprocessors currently have a WYSISTBWYG (what you see
is supposed to be what you get) real-time interface.
> With a typesetting program, it's
> easier to make global, structural changes. For example, if you decide
> to change the formatting of all of the chapter headings in your
> document, LaTeX knows what a chapter heading is; Word does not --
> unless you use style sheets, in which case the ability to dash off
> quick documents goes away.
But that's just because LaTeX is a "style sheet" (ok, macro format)
for the typesetting engine TeX.
> Once you start writing large documents, a word processor's initial
> easy-to-use appeal goes away. You end up navigating through deeper
> and deeper menu structures;
???
> you have to learn how to write, modify,
> and extend style sheets;
The complexity of this depends on the wordprocessor. Also, if you want
to customize LaTeX, you have to go through very complex acrobatics.
> you may even find yourself having to write
> code (in, say, Visual Basic).
Again, this depends on the wordprocessor. And, you have to code in
LaTeX too. As for the easiness of the programming language, I never
used VBA, luckly, but PerfectScript (WordPerfect's pl) is not harder
than TeX.
> Is that still so easy? A typesetting
> program takes a little longer to learn initially, but once you
> understand the basic concepts, they carry through from beginner's work
> through the most complicated document you'll ever write.
I do agree that wordprocessors are easier to use initially, but show
their limits as soon as you want to "go further". But still, how many
users want to "go further"? (And "going further" with LaTeX is not
that easy either. Also, it often require knowledge of the underlying
system to know how and where to install packages, etc).
> > Factor 3: current usage.
> >
> > If you need to do a "heavily" scientific thesis (lots of formulas and
> > things like that), TeX is THE choice: good quality output with small
> > efforts.
>
> This is very true. I once used the equation editor in PowerPoint
> (same as in Word) and swore I'd never use it again, it involved so
> much effort relative to LaTeX (or anything in the TeX family).
Again, this depends on the wordprocessor. WordPerfect's equation
editor is much more TeX-like and easy to use. The real problem is the
need to "switch contexts" every time you edit an equation.
> I'd add that people who prefer word processors tend not to be
> perfectionists in terms of their document's output quality.
Exactly my point.
> They
> don't see why typesetting guys (like me) cringe when we see improperly
> indented paragraphs, lists, etc. or simple inline equations like
> "f(x+y)" in which the parentheses and plus sign are italicized along
> with the variables. Gack! It all looks equally good to them. Of
> course, it is *possible* to do this right in a word processor, but it
> requires more time and effort than most users are willing to exert.
Exactly my point (interesting how we got to the same conclusion from
different POVs).
--
Giuseppe Bilotta
Axiom I of the Giuseppe Bilotta
theory of IT:
Anything is better than MS
------------------------------
From: Massimiliano Caovilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: turning a pentium into a vt100!
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:29:16 GMT
I,
I'm trying to emulate a vt100 with my laptop to drive an old Sparc over
a
null-modem cable. I've been told this can be done with minicom, but up
to now
I couldn't figure out how.
Any hint?
Thanks very much
ciao, Massimiliano
------------------------------
From: Roger Lindmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: XChat 1.7.7-1 problem
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:31:32 +0200
Hi all!
I upgraded to this version through rpm, but when I try to log on an irc
server. I get conncected, but after notify display I get this message:
08:44:45 --- Excess flood
08:44:45 --- Disconnected (Remote host closed socket).
The version supplied with RedHat 7.1 XChat 1.6.3 works OK and I have 10
nicks in my notify list.
Grateful for suggestions
Sincerely Yours
Roger
--
Roger Lindmark
OS/2 Warp 4.06
RedHat 7.1
------------------------------
From: Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: acces to log files as nonroot
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:02:56 -0400
Stefan Rauch wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm using a viewer, that shows me some logfiles (/var/log/messages) on the
> background of my desktop (like root-tail). Therefore I have to set the
> read-bit for others (instead of -rw-r----- I us -rw-r--r--). But there is a
> cronjob running on SuSE, that zips that file from time to time. After that
> cronjob, the accesrights are set to -rw-r----- again.
> Where can I change this behaviour?
I suggest you not do that, and that you not set /var/log/messages to
-rw-r--r-- because these files can get secret information in them that
you do not wish not root users to access.
As a palliative (that I do not recommend), add yourself to the root
group. Or consider the sudo command (I never use it, but it is
designed for things like this).
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 73926.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 7:00am up 7 days, 19:55, 4 users, load average: 2.26, 2.19, 2.11
------------------------------
From: "Sinistar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Enabling /dev/dsp for RW perms during telnet session
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:04:14 GMT
"Sinistar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:K_6W6.14867$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> After a while of wrangling, I finally figured out how to make it work the
> way I wanted it to - I had to chmod a+rw /dev/dsp. This worked great
until
> the machine had to be rebooted. Upon reboot, the permissions for /dev/dsp
> were returned to their old crw------- permissions.
Found the answer!
Had to modify /etc/security/console.perms in order to keep it from switching
the <sound> permissions from 666 back to 600.
Learnin' something new everyday...
-- Trav
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mea Culpa)
Subject: Two identical HDUs, but Linux disaggrees
Date: 15 Jun 2001 04:05:59 -0700
Hi,
I have the following problem: I have the following IDE-setup:
ALI15X3: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 78
ALI15X3: chipset revision 193
ALI15X3: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd000-0xd007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xd008-0xd00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
hda: WDC AC26400R, ATA DISK drive
hdb: IBM-DHEA-36480, ATA DISK drive
hdc: IBM-DHEA-36480, ATA DISK drive
hdd: CD-ROM 40X/AKU, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
hda: 12594960 sectors (6449 MB) w/512KiB Cache, CHS=784/255/63, (U)DMA
hdb: 12692736 sectors (6499 MB) w/476KiB Cache, CHS=790/255/63,
UDMA(33)
hdc: 12692736 sectors (6499 MB) w/476KiB Cache, CHS=12592/16/63,
UDMA(33)
hdd: ATAPI 40X CD-ROM drive, 128kB Cache, DMA
For some reason, although /dev/hdb and /dev/hdc are identical HDUs,
their specs differ. However, @ my BIOS, I specified them both to LBA,
which resulted in the same CHS-setup. Because I want to do striping
(RAID), I will run into trouble with this.
Questions: Why is Linux doin' this? How can I make them identical from
Linux-point-of-view?
I'm using kernel 2.4.4.
------------------------------
From: Robert Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Screen not responding
Date: 15 Jun 2001 11:22:21 GMT
"Kalyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
In a message on Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:49:13 -0700, wrote :
"> "Dances With Crows" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
"> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
"> > >Because
"> > >of that I gave the *fuser -km /mnt* command. After that the screen
"> > >stopped responding, even if I give CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE or CTRL+ALT+DEL,
"> > >it is not responding. Can any one suggest me what should I do.
">
"> > Don't eject a CD-ROM until after you've umounted it. The
"> > kernel is getting confused because it thinks there is a CD-ROM in the
"> > drive when there is none, and this is most likely behind the freeze you
"> > saw.
">
">
"> Is restarting is the only solution, to get away this freezed screen. It
"> hurts me, I am upset about the uptime of my machine.
It *might* come back if you re-insert the CD otherwise, yes you need to
hit the reset button. THIS IS NOT LINUX'S FAULT. It is operator
ERROR! The *cure* is to NOT to physically remove (eject) mounted file
systems. Your CD-ROM is brain dead -- you *should NOT be able* to eject
the CD if it is mounted (unless you are having way too much fun
unbending paper clips and sticking them in the hole in the front of your
CD-ROM drive).
">
">
">
--
\/
Robert Heller ||InterNet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~heller || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.deepsoft.com /\FidoNet: 1:321/153
------------------------------
From: Robert Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP: Mouse broken on Mandrake 8.0
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:12:52 +0100
Mesner wrote:
> Hi, I'm having a problem with my mouse ever since I upgraded from Mandrake
> 7.2 to 8.0. When I run gpm I get the error:
> gpm: oops() invoked from gpm.c(962)
> /dev/psaux: No such device
> It also does not work in X.
Have you configured your mouse in X? It should go direct to the
/dev/psaux device, if it's a wheel mouse try imps/2 protocol.
> Now, /dev/psaux DOES in fact exist with major 10 and minor 1. Also
> /dev/mouse is symbolically linked to /dev/psaux. My kernel is 2.4.3-20mdk.
>
> Can anyone offer any advice as this problem is really getting to me. I'm
> quite an experienced linux user but this is quite baffling.
Don't run gpm when you're running XFree4, the mouse handling has improved
immensly, and is much faster. If you set up X to receive mouse input from
a gpm pipe, you are loosing the advantages of the new mouse driver.
For scroll wheel, you simply have to set up the buttons 4 and 5 for Z-axis
mapping.
Either run X or gpm for mouse handling, but not both. That means if run
level 5 is the graphical one, remove gpm links in the rc?.d directories,
checkconfig(8) should help you with this.
Rob
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yvan Loranger)
Subject: Re: I want the numlock on!
Date: 15 Jun 2001 11:52:24 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yvan Loranger)
"Joel" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
> How can I set up linux so that the numlock is always on by default? It is
> turned on by the BIOS, but then the kernel turns it off. Also, when I turn
> it on, if I switch to a different virtual terminal (Ctrl+Alt+F?, what are
> these called?), it goes off again. Is it a setting in the kernel when it's
> built? I am currently building my own distribution to fit my likings, so I
> will need to download any programs.
For console [X is another matter] put the foll. at the end
of /etc/rc.d/rc.local:
for t in 1 2 3 4 5 6
do
setleds +num < /dev/tty$t
done
--
Merci........Yvan Pour le plein air: Club Vertige
http://www.ncf.ca/vertige
------------------------------
Date: 15 Jun 2001 7:47:38 -0500
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2.4.2 Kernel Compiling Problem
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Gene Heskett sends Greetings to Skylar Thompson;
ST> I am having some trouble compiling the 2.4.2 kernel. Whenever I try to
ST> compile it
ST> (make dep;make clean; etc.), it displays: .hdepend:1493 Unterminated
ST> variable reference. I have tried getting the source again from the CD, to
ST> no avail. Is there any way to fix this problem, or do I have to go back
ST> to the 2.2.18 kernel?
ST> -- Skylar Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I stay up on kernels and ISTR I saw that in one of the 2.4.2 updates.
It wasn't something I fellt I could fix, so I just waited for the next
2.4.2-ac## patch, which did fix it.
I'd do two things.
1. goto rawhide and get the newest revision number of the whole gcc
family, this included libstdc++ and cpp. Its much more stable. Its
about 6 files to get it all.
2. Goto kernel.org and get the basic 2.4.5 sources, and maybe even the
-ac14 patch for it. The reasoning being that since 2.4.2, huge amounts
of the code have been subjected to the Stanford Code Verifier, catching
the things that USED to cause the compiler to output warnings by the
megabyte. The whole thing builds with amazingly few of those going by
today.
Cheers, Gene
--
Gene Heskett, CET, UHK |Amiga A2k Zeus040, 70MB ram, 31 gigs
| Linux @ 500mhz, 320MB ram, 50 gigs
email gene underscore heskett at iolinc dot net
#Amiga based X10 home automation program EZHome, see at:#
<http://www.iolinc.net/gene_heskett>
This messages reply content, but not any previously quoted material,
is � 2001 by Gene Heskett, all rights reserved.
--
------------------------------
From: "Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Two identical HDUs, but Linux disaggrees
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:06:36 +0200
> I have the following problem: I have the following IDE-setup:
>
> ALI15X3: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 78
> ALI15X3: chipset revision 193
> ALI15X3: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd000-0xd007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
> ide1: BM-DMA at 0xd008-0xd00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
> hda: WDC AC26400R, ATA DISK drive
> hdb: IBM-DHEA-36480, ATA DISK drive
> hdc: IBM-DHEA-36480, ATA DISK drive
> hdd: CD-ROM 40X/AKU, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> hda: 12594960 sectors (6449 MB) w/512KiB Cache, CHS=784/255/63, (U)DMA
> hdb: 12692736 sectors (6499 MB) w/476KiB Cache, CHS=790/255/63,
> UDMA(33)
> hdc: 12692736 sectors (6499 MB) w/476KiB Cache, CHS=12592/16/63,
> UDMA(33)
> hdd: ATAPI 40X CD-ROM drive, 128kB Cache, DMA
>
> For some reason, although /dev/hdb and /dev/hdc are identical HDUs,
> their specs differ. However, @ my BIOS, I specified them both to LBA,
> which resulted in the same CHS-setup. Because I want to do striping
> (RAID), I will run into trouble with this.
>
> Questions: Why is Linux doin' this? How can I make them identical from
> Linux-point-of-view?
The disc is reporting this geometry. Linux does not use the BIOS for this.
You could still try to enter a user specified geometry in the BIOS. (I doubt
it will work)
A better option is to provide the geometry in your lilo.conf:
IIRC append="hdb=790,255,63 hdc=790,255,63"
But read the lilo documentation first
Eric
------------------------------
From: Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Shared library path.
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:09:03 +0200
Joel wrote:
>
> How can I add a search directory for shared libraries? /lib, and /usr/lib
> are the defaults, but I want to add /usr/local/lib to that path, because
> some of the programs I am going to use want their libraries there. I also
> want to add /usr/X11R6/lib to the path. I can't find any envirounment
> varibles, so what do I do to change the path? Thanks.
check /etc/ld.so.conf and run 'ldconfig -v' if you change anything.
'man ldconfig' for more info.
Michael Heiming
------------------------------
From: Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Shared library path.
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:15:05 +0200
Joel wrote:
>
> How can I add a search directory for shared libraries? /lib, and /usr/lib
> are the defaults, but I want to add /usr/local/lib to that path, because
> some of the programs I am going to use want their libraries there. I also
> want to add /usr/X11R6/lib to the path. I can't find any envirounment
> varibles, so what do I do to change the path? Thanks.
check /etc/ld.so.conf and run 'ldconfig -v' if you change anything.
'man ldconfig' for more info.
Michael Heiming
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Page)
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP question
Date: 15 Jun 2001 05:24:22 -0700
Dustin Puryear wrote:
> > On 11 Jun 2001 06:00:39 -0700, Alex Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >I'm trying to add an ldif file which looks like:
> >dn: ou=IT,dc=solid-state-logic,dc=com
> >objectclass: organisationalunit
> >cn: IT Department
> >dn: uid=alexp,ou=IT,dc=begbroke,dc=solid-state-logic,dc=com
> >objectclass: person
> >uid: alexp
> >givenname: Alex
> >sn: Page
> >cn: Alex Page
> First, you need to ensure you have already created an appropriate entry for
> dc=solid-state-logic,dc=com before you create an entry for
> ou=IT,dc=solid-sate-logic,dc=com. Second, an object class violation usually
> means (if I remember correctly--it's been a while) that you are violating the
> schema. Hmm, does the objectclass person actually have the uid attribute?
Right, I've kind of gotten this working. I discovered the -v switch to
ldapadd, which tells you where in a multi-dn ldif file the problem is.
I've got valid entries for dn: dc=solid-state-logic,dc=com and for dn:
dc=begbroke,dc=solid-state-logic,dc=com. I find that I can add users
directly beneath this (i.e. dn: cn=Alex
Page,dc=begbroke,dc=solid-state-logic,dc=com).
My trouble now is that I can't add an organisationalUnit between my
user entries and the lowest dc. I'd really like to address all the
users in the form of dn: cn=Alex
Page,ou=it,dc=begbroke,dc=solid-state-logic,dc=com
My entry for the ou=it looks like this:
dn: ou=it,dc=begbroke,dc=solid-state-logic,dc=com
ou: it
objectclass: organisationalunit
objectclass: top
description: IT Support Unit
According to http://ldap.hklc.com this should be all I need, but I get
my old "Object class violation" error when I try to ldapadd this
entry.
Can you only have ou's beneath organisations? If so, how do I sort my
users within the DNS-based hierarchy?
Alex
------------------------------
From: "Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Novit� - News
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:44:07 GMT
Ciao a tutti
Tante novit� sul mio sito: www.danielcity.com
- GOSSIP
- INCONTRARSI IN RETE
- RISORSE PER WEB MASTER
E tanto altro.
Vi aspetto numerosi
Daniel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edwin Johnson)
Subject: Re: What to use to write my thesis?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15 Jun 2001 12:53:26 GMT
Might take a look at lyx, a great front end to tex/latex.
...Edwin
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:24:45 -0500, Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leonard Evens wrote:
>>
>> Wroot wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm wondering what software or standars people would recommend for writing
>> > technical scientific papers and a thesis?
>> >
>> > If I understand correctly, the main options are MS Word and LaTeX. If I
>> > choose the former, I'll have to find a Windows machine or a Mac (I prefer
>> > Linux and FreeBSD). OTOH, LaTeX requires considerable learning.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Wroot
>>
>> My son started at a Sun workstation, knowing very little about
>> how to use it and nothing about LaTeX, and six weeks later
>> (or maybe it was three weeks later) he had a complete thesis
>> done. It was a mathematics thesis which is generally harder
>> than theses in other disciplines because of the complicated
>> LaTeX formatting of mathematics that is often necessary.
>> So if you put your mind to it, you should be able to do it
>> and then you will know LaTeX. If you use Word, you won't
>> end up knowing much more than when you started.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Leonard Evens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 847-491-5537
>> Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208
>
> Let me also add that it is incumbent on us Linux users to fight
> sprawl. I have written a couple of several hundred page books,
> the tex source for each fitting on a one floppy disk. On the
> other hand my wife regularly gets papers of some 40 pages or
> so from her students written in MS Word which are one-two
> megabytes in size.
> --
>
> Leonard Evens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 847-491-5537
> Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ Edwin Johnson ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
~ http://www.shreve.net/~elj ~
~ ~
~ "Once you have flown, you will walk the ~
~ earth with your eyes turned skyward, ~
~ for there you have been, there you long ~
~ to return." -- da Vinci ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------
From: "Oliver Schalch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Tango2000 client error
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:01:52 +0200
Hello,
I looking for peoples how work too with high running Tango2000 Web
Application Server, unfortunately is this product not any longer
supported by the manufacturers.
In example we running website with more than 800'000 hits per day on
Tango2000/Apache.
In undefined time there is a "tango client error" then I have to
restart the tango2000 server, after this restart it seems all okey
again for a undefinied time till the next "tango client error".
anybody, has some nice tunning tips? or special documentaion about
memory organisiation/threads etc.
I suppose it can be, thats tango2000 not realy good manage the memory,
so if a restart occurs the memory is again clean!
any suggestions, experience?
-
Anybody knows some information about the html error msg hadnling?
greez
oli
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
