---David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) KDE. This is a combo windowmanager and desktop. It has a very good
> look and feel, but does a lot of stuff which makes it slower than
> Windowmaker. It's desktop is somewhere between Windows95 and OS/2 4.0
> in functionality. It's file manager is probably the simplest out there
> but it still packs a wallop!
Is it still true that KDE uses some non-GNU, commercial libraries, or
is it now free/opensource?
What about GNOME? Or is it not far enough along to be a real contender?
Thanks.
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
