> Actually I thought it was quite explicit: "without having > to worry about caching effects". What you described is > clearly a caching effect: caused by caching.
Is it really a cache effect? Isn't it caused by the hc writing more bytes to memory than you expected? Now, it so happens that the number of bytes it writes is equal to the cache line size (or so it seems), but isn't that irrelevant? Ciao, Duncan. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
