Joel,
Are there any rules regarding a) who can run a PITR and b) what prefixes that
PITR can advertise? If so, who enforces the rules? How?
Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:45 PM
> To: Dino Farinacci
> Cc: Ronald Bonica; LISP mailing list list
> Subject: Re: [lisp] WGLC draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-07
>
> And ISPs are certainly allowed to run PITRs.
> They can either advertise only the customers they support, or forward
> traffic for other folks who may well not even be their customers.
> Their call.
> But the LISP RFCs are not going to mandate that.
> And I expect that there will be other alternatives.
>
> Yours,
> Joel
>
> On 12/5/13 10:41 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> >> PITRs can be run by anyone who wants to (with suitable
> authentication / authorization). So they can be run (as Dino
> hypothesizes) by the ISPs. They can be run by the EID allocators. Or
> by third parties. In all cases, they either have to be prepared for
> too much traffic or restrict what they advertise into the BGP system.
> Which is why I hope that it will make business sense for the allocators
> to run PITRs, since they are the only ones in the right place to easily
> provide aggregation of EID allocations.
> >
> > I envision existing ISPs to run PxTRs because they have capacity
> planned for data movement. Where MSPs are adminstrative and policy
> driven. They don't need the bandwidth capacity as the data-plane
> providers. So, in theory they could do both but I envision that an
> existing data-plane ISP would offer MSP services versus the other way
> around.
> >
> > Dino
> >
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
