--- Alfred Urrutia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basic physics tells us that? Really? Where? And what "material"
> are
> we talking about here? Steel? Titanium? Does basic physics allow
> for
> a material or alloy *that isn't around currently* that might be the
>
> difference in structural soundness to the materials you are
> assuming
> now? So, this pile-driver, what other use is it besides as a
> pile-driver? Why not a blade instead? "But a blade wouldn't be
> able to
> cut through the armor!" Ah, what assumptions have you made about
> what
> this blade would be made out of? Metal? A composite of some kind?
>
> What about using a beam of energy along its edge? Hm, now that
> changes
> things (if it's possible to make one). But a pile-driver would be
> good,
> too. Yes. So would a cannon, maybe both limbs should be cannons.
> Or
> gatling guns. Or missile launchers. Or one of each. Ok, one of
> each.
> Which two? Fuck, it would be so much easier if we could swap
> through
> *all* those weapons (and any others that might come up later)!
> Wait,
> call me crazy, but,... what if we put a *hand* at the...
You are in way too deep in the science FICTION end of the pool.
---------------------------
Minh-Nhat Ba Le
---------------------------
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
--------------------------------------------------
The Gundam Mailing List MK-II [email protected]
Archives: http://www.gundam.com/gml
Help: Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this in
the BODY: help list
