On 10/01/2014 03:38 PM, musikbear wrote: > diiz wrote >> a fixed EQ for every channel is already adding to the CPU load > Here you get close to the answer i was looking for > Am i to understand this, as having /default EQ on each FM-mixer-channel/ > will take /more CPU/ that adding a 10band-ladspa-EQ manually to every > channel in a project?
The question is irrelevant because the premise is flawed. You are assuming that every project wants an EQ on every channel - and that every project wants **the same** EQ on every channel. This assumption is especially flawed since we have channel routing now. Say you route channel 4 -> 2 -> 1... you'd usually only need an EQ on channel 1. But now you'd have 3 EQs where you'd only need 1 - that's 2 extra EQs taking CPU. And maybe you're using a sample that's already been EQ'd and you don't need an EQ at all. That's now 3 EQs more than you need. Even worse, say you need a different EQ than the fixed one - maybe you need a specific, accurate parametric EQ. Now there's 3 pointless EQs taking CPU, plus the EQ you actually need. So the additional CPU load comes from having EQs where you don't necessarily need EQs, and having the wrong EQs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
