diiz wrote
> So the additional CPU load comes from having EQs where you don't
> necessarily need EQs, and having the wrong EQs. 

And that is the closer for me. diiz' argument is convincing me that it would
be a bad idea. Its olso more modular to add setate EQs where they belong.
EQs default on all FX-channels : Not a good idea.




--
View this message in context: 
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/mixer-EQ-default-on-each-channel-tp10471p10504.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to