Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, the truth is that it's just more than individual professional > members. From http://www.lpi.org/en/lpi/english/about_lpi > ... > So it's both. But note that that means individuals and industry, > not just industry.
Which is why you must be _careful_ when you start stating what LPI is and what it was founded upon. It's the difference between being a "considerate, impartial peer professional" and just another "grandstanding peer." ;-> Thank you for [re-]educating yourself after I pointed it out. > And it would seem that only industry was consulted with this latest > move, and the extent of how much consultation was done with whom > has yet to be established. And then the rhetoric starts ... sigh. My apologies to the list for even responding to Alan. I'll shut-up now. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
