On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:30 PM Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 12:29 PM Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Big deal. 10 minutes with vimtutor should fix that.
>
> All the more reason for the 10 minutes VIMtutor to be part of any LPIC-1
> course.  ;)
> Just like 10 minute tutorials on ...
>  - Regex/Sed
>  - Piping/Redirection
>

Well, I'm glad you guys all learn everything in 10 minute sprints.  I still
take half an hour to make a 3 minute egg.


A) New 101 + 102 focus ...
> Make 101 the 'common denominator' with a new set of optional 102, 103,
> etc... exams.
>
> 103 - a new automation/orchestration option, even add some more DB tooling
> and other things 'in the real world' for junior admins?  Again, the
> MySQL/MariaDB stuff comes up regularly too.
>
> B) Alternative 111 + 112 track ...
> This would be a new 'automation/orchestration' track, that is purely
> non-interactive
>

> Others?


You keep saying 'automation track'.  Maybe we could expand the DevOps cert
into a full and separate track (or diverging) and include some of LPIC-1
(and LPIC-2)?
--matt


>
>
>> We should certainly not suggest to candidates that in 2019, vi is an
>> editor
>> that is recommended to use day in, day out, especially for editing non-
>> configuration files in non-emergencies. (Vim might be.)
>
>
> I think you're making this too much about Vi v. ViM.
>
> If you want to say there should only be Vi (and not ViM) on the
> objectives, point made.  I utterly agree.  But it must be known in the
> 'interactive' focused exams/tracks.
>
> In any case, I think this is far more about than just Vi.
>
> - bjs
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev



-- 
G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]>                         gpg id: 0x17CF9077
Executive Director, Linux Professional Institute
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to