On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 11:14 -0400, G. Matthew Rice wrote: > Well, we're Linux focused but integration is a real world scenario that we > should cover, too. We should include winbind and let the JTA tell us how > important it is to everyone.
I agree that the JTA will flush everything out. *HOWEVER*, a key detail to that will be that people realize what things like Winbindd can be used for, beyond just Samba file services. E.g., remember that Samba just provides Winbindd, Samba doesn't just provide Winbindd for Samba only. ;-> > I like the 'A&R', too. It may be possible to have an LPIC-3 with no core > exam. It's just an unqualified LPIC-3. Then it's combinations of multiple > exams to get something like an 'LPIC-3 Security Specialist' or and 'LPIC-3 > Enterprise Architect' or ... For ISP/ASPs, basic auth/dir/name might be optional knowledge. But for enterprise administrators, I think we'll be referring back to basic auth/dir/name in other exams. I think the JTA will show this if we go with the organization I've been pitching. But we'll get to that when we get to that. For now, just remember to keep in mind that not all services only work for one other service. In fact, many services work for many others. > We don't have to shy away from making the LDAP portion of the exam hard. > It is an advanced level exam, after all. I was shying away from getting too deep with LDAP in the first exam out of sheer breadth. Focus on the key significance and services of enterprise-wide auth/dir/name, and then worry about more advanced LDAP schema and services later. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com ---------------------------------------------------------- The existence of Linux has far more to do with the breakup of AT&T's monopoly than anything Microsoft has ever done. _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
