It was Thu May 17 at 03:49PM when G. Matthew Rice wrote:
> > That's why I never understood that we kept the idea of a Debian version
> > and a Red Hat version behind. Distribution independent shouldn't be the
> > same as "about all distributions"
>
> True but package management is useful and necessary. And there are more
> packaging systems out there than dpkg and rpm. LPI definitely didn't pick
> 'all of them'.
>
> That said, if anyone wants to propose additional (I couldn't support dropping
> either dpkg nor rpm) packaging systems or higher level ones, like yum, let me
> know.
ebuild!
--
regards,
Bart Van Loon
"That's the whole problem with science. You've got a bunch of
empiricists trying to describe things of unimaginable wonder."
--- Calvin
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
