> The former will have all the good parts for the centralized solution, and the latter will have all the good parts for the distributed solution.
And in your view which draft should contain required protocol extensions to accommodate both solutions ? Or are you suggesting that we should have completely different protocol extensions for distribution of centralized computed graphs vs for propagating parameters allowing customized distributed computation of partial flooding topology ? Thx, R. On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 5:44 PM Huaimo Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > > > There are two drafts containing the centralized solution and distributed > solution already on the table too. If the two drafts are adopted, they need > to be updated for one draft to focus on the centralized solution and the > other on the distributed solution. The former will have all the good parts > for the centralized solution, and the latter will have all the good parts > for the distributed solution. > > > > Best Regards, > > Huaimo > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
