A very strong +1.

   Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2019 12:14 PM
> To: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]>
> Cc: Huaimo Chen <[email protected]>; [email protected]; David
> Allan I <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]
> 
> 
> I think that this discussion would be greatly clarified if we clearly 
> separated
> the discussion between
> 
> a) the algorithm for computing the flooding topology, and
> b) the signaling to indicate how to proceed.
> 
> I think that we are all in agreement that the algorithms can and should be
> separated from the signaling.
> 
> I think that we are all in agreement that each algorithm should be
> independent.
> 
> I’m of the opinion that the centralized signaling is a bit more extensive than
> the signaling for the distributed mode, but that there is also considerable
> overlap and that things would
> be unnecessarily redundant if we were to separate them. I believe that we
> are not in disagreement about the basics for the distributed signaling.
> 
> If you disagree with this, please clearly articulate why you feel the 
> signaling
> should be separated.
> 
> Regards,
> Tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to