On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:00 AM, Mike Barnard wrote:
Kurup...instead of going back and forth about who pulled out and
who did not, take a stroll to the IX. the state itself leaves a lot
to be desired.
Ok, I only wanted to know so I can remove stale configs :-)
It seems you only recently took a stroll there for the first time.
That place has always been a mess my friend.
The last time I was there (sometime in January), I even took photo
evidence.
There is dust everywhere. And the inverter has dead batteries. Infact
the uptime of Infocom's router at the IX has never been more than 2
days.
its not the pipe to the IX that is a problem....
I sometimes get RTTs in excess of 2500ms when reaching some peers
which is more than what it would be over the 2 sat hops.
And a traceroute would show that the latencies build from the IX to
that peer. Wouldn't that explain a congested pipe?
--
Hari Kurup
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
