The future of copyright is anything but certain. The law, by its nature, is ever evolving, and there is not necessarily a simple and elegant solution to every problem.

This has proved to be especially true for copyright law. Copyright law is facing pressure from the changing face of technology and the nature of the works being protected. With the advent of cheap and powerful home computers in recent years, virtually every home PC can be used to cheaply and easily churn out a vast number of copies of copyrighted works.

P2P and other file sharing technologies have further challenged the efficacy of the current copyright regime..

Critically analyzing the so called copy righted materials, even the materials them selves are a copyright infringement ...a radio X giving me news they MIGHT have picked from BBC is as well copyright infringement... but the point is, can you prove it came from BBC? (only if BBC made the news :))

EG: The very words in gospel music were gotten from the bible ...
did they have permission from God to use them? can they prove it?
"Stealing a stolen something from a thief does not make me a thief :)"


On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:51:37 +0300, Tim Schofield <[email protected]> wrote:

Well Badru did say earlier in this thread that he intends to earn
money by this site, so I am unsure on which side you are arguing Mike.
Should he pay some of the money he earns over to the artists or not?

On 09/08/2010, Mike Barnard <[email protected]> wrote:
wow... its getting hot in here.... Tim I think we miss what Badru started by posting that link. He clearly and has clearly continued to say, " lets grow
this. lets tackle all those grey areas as we grow this".

I pasted a section of our newest IPR and Copyright laws, which you all seem
to have ignored. There is no copyright that protects a broadcast. In our
current law, taking from what Patrick Okui said, you may go ahead and
rebrand a Sanyu FM broadcast and as per our law (i stand to be corrected)
you are not infringing on any ones rights.

Granted that all artists have a right to their material and to have it
protected under the law, and this is catered for in the law. I had earlier
said that if Badru was re-broadcasting these earlier broadcasts with the
intention of making money, then the artists whose songs are aired in Badru's re-broadcast have a right to sue Badru. If you are simply broadcasting with no intention of earning anything from it, look at the law, it does not cater
for that.

Tim, you seem bent on this copyright issue and rightfully so, but apply it according to the laws of Uganda, not a law that we do not have in the land. The reason there was an amendment to the old 1960's IPR and Copyright law
was to cater for the emerging markets. This is what Badru keeps on
mentioning that we need to grow as YRadio continues to develop. I don't
understand and see why you are opposing that. We need to grow, YRadio, in this heated debate has brought out areas that need to be ironed out as far
as our laws are concerned. Stifling ideas because of looking at one
countries laws over another will not help us grow. Allow us to experience this and make the necessary laws to protect our rights. You have learnt, let us learn. Allow us the privilege of understanding what something is other
than enforcing something someone else has understood from its inception.

Badru, charge on.



On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Wire James <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>
> Tim
>
>
> Get off your high horse. While many of us may be concerned about the
rights of copyright holders, the situation not only in Uganda but many other
African Countries outside South Africa is similar. Many times members on
this list who are in business can vouch for this, people have come up with
proposals, ideas, innovations e.t.c and they are 'stolen' from them
unashamedly and in most instances by corporates that originate from the so called purist countries you are trying to talk about. I recall a very famous
case of one Lugger whose company tussled it out with a giant over
infringement of copyright on some software. This big company thought it
would frustrate the guy through the court process but luckily enough, he was
able to push on till the big elephant sought an out of court settlement.
However, how many people have been lucky enough to achieve such justice here in Uganda? Few, very few. That is why you find the laissez faire attitude among the list members because we have more pressing problems and needs than
pretending that copyright will change our lives. Many times we submit
proposals for jobs and they are 'copy n pasted' by competitors who have
insiders in the organisations we are approaching. It is a dog eat dog world for now and I will unashamedly tell you that as for now, copyright issues are at the bottom of our list of problems to think about. I would rather see Badru's project go on if its aim has a more positive impact on this nation
eventually than guarding worthless songs that have nothing to copyright
about. Many of these musicians would not even earn a dime if copyright was
to be observed to the letter in this country. I remember 4 years ago a
musician I helped to get paid US$ 1500 for a 3 hour show all because I came across his music on a website that he even didnt know about. Like someone
said, it is a skewed market. Just understand it the way it is.
>
> Wire
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 14:26 +0300, Tim Schofield wrote:
> On 09/08/2010, Joseph Abdi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Tim,
> >
> > It's because 90% of the list members have not faced copy-right issues ..
> > Also, since almost 90% of our website materials in Uganda don't use
> > original materials one does not
> > yet see the need or importance of copy-right ...
> >
> > And again, remember this is a LUG list (Open-Source) where FREE, COPY,
> > RE-USE
> > is Legal ...with the OS mentality and mind-set, you can hardly have
support
> > or understanding of it here ..
>
> No no no no. Open source is only about free re-use if you keep within
> the narrow confines of the license that the software is issued under,
> for example the GPL. It in no way condones the abuse of copyright.
> Copyright is at the very heart of the GPL. Anyone on this list who is
> using a kernel more recent than 2.6.13 is using some of my copyrighted
> code which I allow them to do providing they stick to the letter of
> the license that the code is released under (GPL v2.0).
>
> Every open source developer, and those who benefit from the use of
> open source should be active in the protection of the rights of
> copyright holders. I have spoken at LUG meetings around the world, and
> never before found a group who consider that copyright holders rights
> should be abused.
>
> You clearly believe the rest of the world will throw off its
> fluffiness and join Uganda in this. Trust me you will be disappointed.
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
>
> LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> All Archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>
>



--
Mike

Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in
a million chances happen 99% of the time.
------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
 LUG mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

 LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

 All Archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

 The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
 ---------------------------------------







--
Should you require technical assistance,
please do not hesitate to contact us directly at http://www.support311.com

Kind Regards,

Abdi Joseph
Jolis | Support | Dept.

"100% Customer Service! - 100% of the Time!"

USA
+--------------------------------
710 North Tucker Blvd.
Suite 610A St. Louis,
MO 63101 USA
USA:   +151.43.794409
Fax:    +1-309-418-9893
--------------------------------+

UGANDA:
+--------------------------------
Plot 22 Namanve, Akright III Estate
P.O. BOX 22930, Kampala,
Uganda, EA.
Tel1:    +256.792.JOSEPH
Tel2:    +256.752.JOSEPH
Tel3:    +256.712.JOSEPH
Tel4:   +256.312.280643
Tel5:   +256.414.577227
Fax:    +1.309-418-9893
--------------------------------+

LIVE SUPPORT:
+--------------------------------
http://www.support311.com
http://www.jolis.net
--------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to