Graham,


   I've been formerly an experienced classical guitarist as well. Let me
   try to answer some of your questions:





   2010/3/18 Graham Freeman <[1][email protected]>

       All,
       I'm finding this discussion very informative and helpful. I'm also
     an
       experienced guitarist and come to theorbo and lute from a
     classical
       guitar background. I still play quite a lot of steel-string
     guitar, as
       there is just too much great music (Pierre Bensusan, Martin
     Simpson)
       for that instrument to ignore. Steel-string technique in
     incredibly
       varied among the many different players, and I've learned a lot
     from
       watching the right-hand of someone like Bensusan, who has a very
       relaxed and flexible right-hand technique that allows him to adapt
     to
       different musical situations.


   That's interesting, unfortunately I am not aware of these players.

     I think that we might learn a lot from
       watching the technique of someone who doesn't feel the need to be
       pedantic about it and lets his hands adapt to different
     situations.
       Perhaps steel-string guitarists have even more to teach us about
     the
       right-hand than do classical guitarists.


   Honestly, classical or steel string players won't give us what we want,
   which is to understand how lute music was played back then. The
   information is partly on the lute tutors, iconography and of course in
   our sensibility. The thumb under or out constantly being described on
   this list, refers not only to the crossing of the thumb inside our
   outside the hand, there is much more to it, believe me...

       That being said, I find the different lute techniques fascinating.
     Paul
       O'Dette seems to be able to use his thumb-under technique for
       everything, including Bach and the theorbo, whereas Nigel North
     seems
       to use a variation of thumb-over technique for everything he does,
       including Dowland.


   It's fine, both techniques work as you noticed. The principle of sound
   production is still there.

     Perhaps my ignorance is showing here, but Nigel
       North's technique seems to be closer to right-hand classical
     guitar
       technique than many others I have seen.

   Just in it's general appearance.

         My questions, I suppose, would be: are we lutenists too pedantic
     about
       technique? Should we perhaps adopt and flexible right-hand that
     can
       adapt to the many different situations in which we find ourselves?


   Which situations? Perhaps playing Berio on the lute? Ginastera, Villa
   Lobos or maybe transcribing Chopin or Debussy?
   Kapsperger did not even use his (a) finger and his music is full of
   scales, arpeggios, slurs and all kinds of ornaments.

     I
       understand the necessity of studying treatises and iconography to
     learn
       more about the way in which the music was played, but surely the
       surviving evidence doesn't encapsulate the ways in which the
     thousands
       of lute players all over Europe played such a popular instrument
     over
       the course so many years.


   Of course not, we would be crazy if we tried to recover the way every
   single lutenist played during more than 400 years. That's an impossible
   task.

     Historical evidence is one thing, but the
       historians among us will certainly recognize that Hayden White and
     Paul
       Ricoeur long ago raised the awareness of the fact that historical
       record can never provide a complete picture of the past, and that
     we
       need to adopt, perhaps, a more phenomenological approach based on
     our
       own experiences in an ongoing historical situation. Perhaps that
     means
       that a 21st century lute player who plays a greater amount of
       repertoire than any historical lutenist ever did, and perhaps also
       plays instruments of which lutenists had never heard (such as
       steel-string guitar) need to adopt the kind of techniques that
     suit
       there situations.

   Well, what I see today is that people are specializing in one
   direction, rather than trying to play 4 centuries of music. However,
   there are players like Hopkinson who does a nice job from renaissance
   to baroque, I think.

       I really do favour a plurality of approaches to technique, an
     approach
       that might earn me the wrath of this board. Nevertheless, it
     occurs to
       me that if, in 400 years, all that is left of the evidence
     concerning
       the ways in which the electric guitar was played by millions of
     people
       in the 20th and 21st centuries is a video of the fairly orthodox
       technique of a few, our descendants might never know of the
     miraculous
       musical results produced by guitarists with extremely unorthodox
       techniques such as Jeff Beck (no right-hand plectrum) or Pat
     Metheny (a
       three-fingered grip on the plectrum instead of the usual two).

   This is not true for lute music. We have many tutors available from
   renaissance and the baroque.

   Best wishes.



       Just my thoughts. Sorry for testing your patience with my
     long-winded
       ramblings.
       Best,
       Graham Freeman

     On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:45 PM, <[1][2][email protected]> wrote:

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to