Some people don't have the funds to "collect lutes" :)

I'm quite happy with 7 courses - it's amazing how just one extra course extends the repertoire well into the 17th century, if you don't mind playing just the upper octaves.


Am 17.03.2018 um 02:52 schrieb spiffys84121:
    I will play any music on lutes, if it works for that lute. I believe in
    using the right tool for the job-- unlike guitarists and pianists who
    endeavor to build the whole house with just a hammer.

    My question-- do most lute players only specialize in one repertoire? I
    play any lute music from almost the entire history of the lute-- except
    medieval. Of course this requires multiple lutes, which I'm happy to
    collect and play. I go through phases, like sometimes all I want to do
    is play six course music; then all of a sudden baroque lute is all I
    care about in life. Right now I'm obsessed with the liuto attiorbato
    which I think is the most versatile of all lutes. If for some reason I
    had to have only one lute, it would be an attiorbato. One can play
    hundreds of years worth of music on it(in a pinch) I'm working on my
    version of 'Georga on my Mind' at present. My attiorbatos have a range
    of 5 octaves.

    Sterling

    Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

    -------- Original message --------
    From: Leonard Williams <[email protected]>
    Date: 3/16/18 3:00 PM (GMT-07:00)
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: [LUTE] Re: Some questions

           I, myself, was attracted to the lute, via recorders and other
    early
       instruments, because I like playing renaissance music.  What better
    way
       to enjoy it than on the instruments for which it was written?  If I
       were an instructor, I would probably be more inclined to teach
       guitarists to read lute-tabbed recercari than to play later music on
       the lute.
       Leonard
       -----Original Message-----
       From: Mathias.Roesel <[email protected]>
       To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
       Sent: Fri, Mar 16, 2018 2:28 pm
       Subject: [LUTE] Re: Some questions
       Everybody is free to do with their lutes, or should be so, what they
       like best.
       Gilbert's initial observation was, though, that some 90% of this
    tiny
       community don't seem to be interested in newly composed music for
    the
       lute. And I take it that he wasn't referring to the lute mailing
    list
       community exclusively, but to lute loving folks in general. They're
       fully entitled, aren't they, to not be interested. And I hasten to
    add
       that I myself refuse to get involved in lute religious discussions
       about whether or not lutes should be taken to play modern music. I
    for
       one prefer to pick up the guitar for such purposes.
       Mathias
       __________________________________________________________________
       Gesendet mit der [1]Telekom Mail App
       --- Original-Nachricht ---
       Von: Wayne
       Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Some questions
       Datum: 16.03.2018, 18:01 Uhr
       An: lute net
       One thing that has not been mentioned is that we have choices - we
    all,
       or most of us, or some of us, can choose to play a certain part of
    our
       repertoire on our Les Paul/Marshall, or our classical guitar, or our
       romantic guitar, or our bandora, or ukulele or even saxophone or
    synth
       in some cases. If we can choose to play Spanish music on our vihuela
    we
       can choose to play Babbit on our (analogue tube) synth. So maybe we
    are
       overlooking contemporary lute music because we tend to pick up a
       different instrument to play something modern. Especially when we
    need
       to be as loud as everyone else.
       Does anyone here not have or play any instrument at all but the
    lute?
       Wayne
       > Begin forwarded message:
       >
       > From: WALSH STUART <[2][1][email protected]>
       > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Some questions
       > Date: March 16, 2018 at 12:26:07 PM EDT
       >
       > If it seems odd to want to play modern music on a lute it is
    surely
       odder to only play a lute and only ever to play music that was
    composed
       centuries ago.
       >
       > Perhaps no one is odd enough for that! If there were such a person
    -
       who would only, ever, play centuries' old music (however gem-laden
    it
       may be) - would it be enough to say that this choice was the
    harmless
       choice of a free being?
       >
       > There is no obvious harm to others in such a case but perhaps it's
    a
       case of self-harm.
       >
       --
       To get on or off this list see list information at
       [3][2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       --
       References
       1.

    [3]http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_foot
       er.htm
       2. [4]mailto:[email protected]
       3. [5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       --
    References
       1. mailto:[email protected]
       2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       3.
    http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_footer.
    htm
       4. mailto:[email protected]?
       5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




Reply via email to