Yes, but they are not "collecting" lutes I guess. They have them because they can play the music intended for it.
Lute collectors seem mostly wealthy amateurs :)
If I don't play an instrument enough, I give it away or sell it.


Am 17.03.2018 um 22:46 schrieb spiffys84121:
    Hmm. Are there  -any- professional lute players that don't have at
    least a few lutes?

    S

    Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

    -------- Original message --------
    From: Ron Andrico <[email protected]>
    Date: 3/17/18 6:36 AM (GMT-07:00)
    To: [email protected], Lutelist <[email protected]>
    Subject: [LUTE] Re: Some questions

       Tristan and Mathais, you have hit upon a very important point.
    While
       not as expensive as they should be relative to the demanding
       craftsmanship of construction, lutes are too costly for professional
       musicians to *collect*.  That is a major hurdle to getting lutes
    into
       the hands of budding players, and the unfortunate dynamic creates a
       *class* of lute players that might possibly exclude young persons
    with
       both interest and potential.
       The Lute Society (UK) has had a lute hire program for many years
    now,
       enabling interested persons to sample an instrument.  The American
    lute
       organization has recently implemented what they call a *lute rental*
       program, an innovation I proposed to them in 2000.  I wish they
    would
       call it a *lute access* program, placing the emphasis on getting
    their
       growing collection of instruments into the hands of potential
       lutenists, rather than the gory details of renting them.
       When it's possible for any interested person without the cost
    barrier,
       and only then, lutes will seem normal rather than unusual, and the
       instrument will thrive in the future.
       RA
         __________________________________________________________________
       From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on
    behalf
       of [email protected] <[email protected]>
       Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2018 7:55 AM
       To: Lutelist
       Subject: [LUTE] Re: Some questions
          Funds may be the pivotal point. For my first ten years with the
    lute
       I
          used to play just anything on my one and only 8c lute that Larry
       Brown
          had built for Budget Instruments Ltd. By anything I mean anything
          (Dowland, Bach, Schubert, Wandervogel lieder, Clapton).
          When funds started to come in, I afforded a swan neck. Then I
          discovered that an 11 was needed because swan necks aren't best
    for
          French Baroque. Then there was that short era of transitional
       tunings,
          requiring a 12c double neck. Finally I realised that a liuto
       attiorbato
          with single basses is not really the thing for Italian arciliuto
       music
          which demands octave strings down to the 14th course. I omit the
          serious reasoning for the chitarone and the angà ©lique.
          I could have done almost all of that music on my old 8c lute,
       probably,
          which still is in good shape. Yet funds were available, and so
    was
       my
          curiosity for new shores to explore.
          Mathias

    __________________________________________________________________
          Gesendet mit der [1]Telekom Mail App
          --- Original-Nachricht ---
          Von: Tristan von Neumann
          Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Some questions
          Datum: 17.03.2018, 8:16 Uhr
          An: lutelist Net
          Some people don't have the funds to "collect lutes" :)
          I'm quite happy with 7 courses - it's amazing how just one extra
       course
          extends the repertoire well into the 17th century, if you don't
    mind
          playing just the upper octaves.
          Am 17.03.2018 um 02:52 schrieb spiffys84121:
          > I will play any music on lutes, if it works for that lute. I
       believe
          in
          > using the right tool for the job-- unlike guitarists and
    pianists
       who
          > endeavor to build the whole house with just a hammer.
          >
          > My question-- do most lute players only specialize in one
       repertoire?
          I
          > play any lute music from almost the entire history of the
    lute--
          except
          > medieval. Of course this requires multiple lutes, which I'm
    happy
       to
          > collect and play. I go through phases, like sometimes all I
    want
       to
          do
          > is play six course music; then all of a sudden baroque lute is
    all
       I
          > care about in life. Right now I'm obsessed with the liuto
       attiorbato
          > which I think is the most versatile of all lutes. If for some
       reason
          I
          > had to have only one lute, it would be an attiorbato. One can
    play
          > hundreds of years worth of music on it(in a pinch) I'm working
    on
       my
          > version of 'Georga on my Mind' at present. My attiorbatos have
    a
          range
          > of 5 octaves.
          >
          > Sterling
          >
          > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
          >
          > -------- Original message --------
          > From: Leonard Williams <[2][email protected]>
          > Date: 3/16/18 3:00 PM (GMT-07:00)
          > To: [3][email protected]
          > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Some questions
          >
          > I, myself, was attracted to the lute, via recorders and other
          > early
          > instruments, because I like playing renaissance music. What
    better
          > way
          > to enjoy it than on the instruments for which it was written?
    If I
          > were an instructor, I would probably be more inclined to teach
          > guitarists to read lute-tabbed recercari than to play later
    music
       on
          > the lute.
          > Leonard
          > -----Original Message-----
          > From: Mathias.Roesel <[4][email protected]>
          > To: [5][email protected] <[6][email protected]>
          > Sent: Fri, Mar 16, 2018 2:28 pm
          > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Some questions
          > Everybody is free to do with their lutes, or should be so, what
       they
          > like best.
          > Gilbert's initial observation was, though, that some 90% of
    this
          > tiny
          > community don't seem to be interested in newly composed music
    for
          > the
          > lute. And I take it that he wasn't referring to the lute
    mailing
          > list
          > community exclusively, but to lute loving folks in general.
       They're
          > fully entitled, aren't they, to not be interested. And I hasten
    to
          > add
          > that I myself refuse to get involved in lute religious
    discussions
          > about whether or not lutes should be taken to play modern
    music. I
          > for
          > one prefer to pick up the guitar for such purposes.
          > Mathias
          >
    __________________________________________________________________
          > Gesendet mit der [1]Telekom Mail App
          > --- Original-Nachricht ---
          > Von: Wayne
          > Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Some questions
          > Datum: 16.03.2018, 18:01 Uhr
          > An: lute net
          > One thing that has not been mentioned is that we have choices -
    we
          > all,
          > or most of us, or some of us, can choose to play a certain part
    of
          > our
          > repertoire on our Les Paul/Marshall, or our classical guitar,
    or
       our
          > romantic guitar, or our bandora, or ukulele or even saxophone
    or
          > synth
          > in some cases. If we can choose to play Spanish music on our
       vihuela
          > we
          > can choose to play Babbit on our (analogue tube) synth. So
    maybe
       we
          > are
          > overlooking contemporary lute music because we tend to pick up
    a
          > different instrument to play something modern. Especially when
    we
          > need
          > to be as loud as everyone else.
          > Does anyone here not have or play any instrument at all but the
          > lute?
          > Wayne
          > > Begin forwarded message:
          > >
          > > From: WALSH STUART <[2][1][7][email protected]>
          > > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Some questions
          > > Date: March 16, 2018 at 12:26:07 PM EDT
          > >
          > > If it seems odd to want to play modern music on a lute it is
          > surely
          > odder to only play a lute and only ever to play music that was
          > composed
          > centuries ago.
          > >
          > > Perhaps no one is odd enough for that! If there were such a
       person
          > -
          > who would only, ever, play centuries' old music (however
    gem-laden
          > it
          > may be) - would it be enough to say that this choice was the
          > harmless
          > choice of a free being?
          > >
          > > There is no obvious harm to others in such a case but perhaps
       it's
          > a
          > case of self-harm.
          > >
          > --
          > To get on or off this list see list information at
          > [3][2][8]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
          > --
          > References
          > 1.
          >
          >

    [3][9]http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_f
          oot
          > [10]er.htm
          > 2. [4]mailto:[11][email protected]
          > 3.
    [5][12]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
          > --
          > References
          > 1. mailto:[13][email protected]
          > 2. [14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
          > 3.
          >

    [15]http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_foo
          ter.
          > htm
          > 4. mailto:[16][email protected]?
          > 5. [17]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
          >
          >
          --
       References
          1.

    [1]http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_foot
       er.htm
          2. [2]mailto:[email protected]
          3. [3]mailto:[email protected]
          4. [4]mailto:[email protected]
          5. [5]mailto:[email protected]
          6. [6]mailto:[email protected]
          7. [7]mailto:[email protected]
          8. [8]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       [9]Lute Mail list technical information
       www.cs.dartmouth.edu
       How do I get on the lute mail list? To get on the mail list, send
    email
       with a Subject: of "subscribe" to [email protected] and
       your name will be added to ...
          9.

    [10]http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_foo
       t
       [11]Information: Die gewünschte Seite konnte nicht gefunden werden
       www.t-online.de
       Die von Ihnen aufgerufene Seite existiert nicht mehr oder ist
       kurzzeitig nicht verfügbar. Bitte kehren Sie zurück zur
    vorhergehenden
       Seite und versuchen Sie es
         10. [12]http://er.htm/
         11. [13]mailto:[email protected]
         12. [14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       [15]Lute Mail list technical information
       www.cs.dartmouth.edu
       How do I get on the lute mail list? To get on the mail list, send
    email
       with a Subject: of "subscribe" to [email protected] and
       your name will be added to ...
         13. [16]mailto:[email protected]
         14. [17]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       [18]Lute Mail list technical information
       www.cs.dartmouth.edu
       How do I get on the lute mail list? To get on the mail list, send
    email
       with a Subject: of "subscribe" to [email protected] and
       your name will be added to ...
         15.

    [19]http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_foo
       ter
       [20]Information: Die gewünschte Seite konnte nicht gefunden werden
       www.t-online.de
       Die von Ihnen aufgerufene Seite existiert nicht mehr oder ist
       kurzzeitig nicht verfügbar. Bitte kehren Sie zurück zur
    vorhergehenden
       Seite und versuchen Sie es
         16. [21]mailto:[email protected]
         17. [22]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       [23]Lute Mail list technical information
       www.cs.dartmouth.edu
       How do I get on the lute mail list? To get on the mail list, send
    email
       with a Subject: of "subscribe" to [email protected] and
       your name will be added to ...
       --
    References
       1.
    http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_footer.
    htm
       2. mailto:[email protected]
       3. mailto:[email protected]
       4. mailto:[email protected]
       5. mailto:[email protected]
       6. mailto:[email protected]
       7. mailto:[email protected]
       8. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      10.
    http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_foot
      11.
    http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_foot
      12. http://er.htm/
      13. mailto:[email protected]
      14. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      15. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      16. mailto:[email protected]
      17. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      18. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      19.
    http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_footer
      20.
    http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_footer
      21. mailto:[email protected]
      22. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      23. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




Reply via email to