I definitely prefer the 30 minute turn around time vs a week or three.

Thanks for the hint with that calibration object. That's exactly the kind
of thing I don't know yet.

I will avoid getting into actual Cura settings here :)

I did manage to figure out how to get Sculpteo set up with a sharable
purchase link like Shapeways. They have a very similar set of material,
color, and quality options like Shapeways, except they have offices all
over the world.

https://www.sculpteo.com/en/print/pcb2molex8878_chamfer_rex_bkw_c11/foSfeAyj

-- 
bkw

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 5:41 AM Gary Hammond <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not bad for a first print. The Creality CR-10 can give good results.
>
> It looks like your may not have enough retraction set in the slicing
> software which can result in the oozing that you are seeing on your print.
> Hot end temp may be slightly too high which can also cause oozing. There is
> a great little test block I use to quickly check filament and settings
> changes. It is at thingiverse.com at
> https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2253091
>
> If the layers delaminate, the hot end temp is too low.
>
> If the bridging sags, the hot end temp is too high, or you don’t have
> sufficient cooling on the job.
>
> If you see ‘ripples’ in the vertical sides, the drive belts need
> tightening, or tolerances on the X/Y axis are sloppy.
>
> If you see stringing, try more retraction.
>
> Shapeways may be better if you are in the US, but where’s the fun and
> satisfaction compared to printing your own creations 😊
>
>
>
> *From:* M100 <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Brian
> White
> *Sent:* Thursday, 29 August 2019 9:20 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [M100] pcb2molex8878
>
>
>
> Astonishingly, I was just able to print a functional carrier in PLA on a
> Creality CR-10S. (A very common home $400 fdm printer from a year ago.)
>
>
>
> I got the printer last year but only opened the box a couple days ago and
> this is only my 3rd attempt to print anything at all.
>
>
>
> The carrier looked like crap on the print bed, but after a little manual
> clean-up, it turned out to actually work!
>
>
>
> So, these things can be printed at home after all.
>
>
>
> (scroll to bottom)
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/zynHU4LSpd5BZBYC9
> <https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphotos.app.goo.gl%2FzynHU4LSpd5BZBYC9&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca8fddd06ba5748b0d0ed08d72c621630%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637026672095133352&sdata=QVjMP%2FJwbG25uo9qKbfsVqk9315KHYRjzD8OZHnvIAw%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Although, for $5, the Shapeways output is way better.
>
>
>
> --
>
> bkw
>

Reply via email to