Personally, I find the Mac way of editing more intutitive, but that's just 
me. Also one of my friends told me that the Mac edits the way sighted folks 
would - i don't know if this is the case in Windows.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Howell" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 1:39 AM
Subject: Re: 3 features that hmm?


>
> Come on this is crazy. You just can't imagine the number of people who
> bitched and complained about this whole editing issue and I believe
> Apple was taken to task by one of the rags put out by the NFB or some
> organization about the editing issue.  APparently enough people
> complained that Apple was trying to provide the flexibility for those
> users who need it.  Yeah, I am one of the Scotts who made this point
> because I remember clearly the noise about this editing issue.  I see
> no benefit in removing it and quite frankly since it's here, whatever
> at this point.  If it really helps someone , fine because there are
> those who would simply not consider the Mac for this reason.  It is an
> option and not a default and that is why it's a feature not worth
> removing. My point is you have to think beyond what you have stated
> and I don't entirely disagree with your point of what is or is not a
> standard way of editing etc.  At the same time, it obviously didn't
> take a great deal of effort to implement it and at least it is an
> option.
> On Aug 29, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
>
>>
>> Also just my oppinion, but I disagree about points 1 and 2.
>>
>> Can't say I ever have used feature numero uno in any OS as there are
>> so few webpages I'd actually want to read 100% of their content, but
>> someone somewhere will find it useful.  You could argue that the
>> reading webpages automatically is as close as Apple could get to a
>> sighted person glancing at the screen when the page comes up and
>> taking in the bigger picture, which we can't do.
>>
>> Voiceover hints are definitely useful and a good thing.  Context
>> sensitive help like that enables most people to be on a way shorter
>> learning curve usually than reading a whole manual and trying to apply
>> things to a ton of situations at once.  It's annoying that they're
>> enabled by default for you or I perhaps, but newbies are going to
>> thank Apple for it no doubt.  Come to that, so will developers who
>> fire up VO for the first time when they receive a disgruntled email
>> from someone who's asking them to make adjustments to their
>> applications.  It'll instantly demonstrate to them the difference
>> between what works and what doesn't, it gives them instructions
>> equally as precise as that email from the VI user would in most cases.
>>
>> Wholeheartedly agreed about point 3 though.  I just don't get this
>> one.  You also hit the nail right on the head with the reason the
>> option shouldn't exist, it modifies a standard that doesn't in any way
>> need to be modified, purely because of some VI people's rut that
>> they're firmly jammed into.  To add weight to a big sweeping oppinion
>> like that, I should say that I was raised on Windows, still use
>> Windows more often than many on here I expect, and I make my fair
>> share of mistakes editing in Mac OS if I haven't done any in a while.
>> I don't see this option as the solution, I see it as cheating.  I
>> doubt that many people will see this as an option to ease their
>> progression into Mac OS as one of the other Scott's suggested, human's
>> just don't work that way, for the most part we're creatures of habit
>> even if they're bad ones.
>>
>> Tricky one though isn't it.  Emailing Apple and asking that a feature
>> be removed seems somehow wrong in my mind.  In any case, I'm not sure
>> they'd get it.  I just tried to explain why I disagree with the
>> feature and what's potentially at stake here to a sighted mac user,
>> and she point blank didn't get it.  I'm not sure that anyone who
>> hasn't had to appreciate how cool mainstream technology that works for
>> us out of the box would, even Apple themselves might not, they
>> probably see the introduction of this feature as the best thing they
>> could've done to silence a lot of whinging lol.
>>
>> Just my 2 cents, or perhaps pennies worth for those on this side of
>> the pond...
>> Scott
>>
>> On 8/29/09, Scott Howell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well good for you, I'm glad you did not need these features and you
>>> learned the way we all started out.  However, of course the only plus
>>> side is that for those who want to make the transition and really
>>> find
>>> what we "grew up with" difficult, will at least have a way to ease
>>> their transition over from the dark side. :)  So, I agree with you,
>>> but these are small prices to pay if it will truly help someone make
>>> the transition.
>>>
>>> On Aug 29, 2009, at 6:17 PM, Marie Howarth wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> well, this is purely my opinion but 3 features that horribly
>>>> remind me
>>>> of windows are as follows.
>>>> 1. automatic reading of a webpage.
>>>> 2. voice over hints. I know what to do in a text area, especially
>>>> when
>>>> it already says edit text.
>>>> 3. insertion point. this has been discussed, it's counter intuitive
>>>> and doesn't teach the vi community how it would look to sighties.
>>>>
>>>> all I can say is I'm so glad these features are optional. they are
>>>> just horrific and no one can tell me that it will help progression
>>>> from windows to mac. I didn't have these features and I am so glad I
>>>> did. mac is not windows, when will people realise this.
>>>>
>>>> overall vo rocks even more in this version, and I am grateful to
>>>> apple
>>>> for giving us a choice. really glad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> >
>
>
> >
> 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to