I've found that too lol. Ah well horses for courses ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Howell" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 10:41 AM Subject: Re: 3 features that hmm?
> > Hmmm, maybe I'm having issues in articulation. My point is and has > been that I don't disagree the feature does more harm then good, > because yes, it does hold one back from truly getting the concept of > editing from the perspective of the majority; if that makes sense. > Asking Apple to remove it at this point makes little sense is what I'm > saying. I recall the debate and all the crap surrounding the issue of > editing one way vs. the other. Personally I would not have wasted the > code, but at the same time if it really proves to be beneficial then > great. I'd hate to think someone would choose not to switch based on > the issue of editing and so, since the feature is here, then great. > Gee, I think this thread has generated nearly as much noise as the > entire editing thread. Hey I see her point and I'm not disagreeing, > just saying since it's here I hope someone will benefit if that is > what is holding them up and yeah, this sure generated a lot of issues > when it came up as a topic. Hell, I had trouble understanding this > initially and now when I do use windows-based screen reader, I have to > work hard at remembering the old way of editing. :) > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
