I suppose things will come up to where what happens if people who used macs had to go for Windows one day for work or something. Whether we like it or not, none of the Windows screen readers let you switch it so you'd have to learn how windows speaks the insertion point even though for sighted people it wouldn't be a change at all in that respect. I guess this history goes before my time why JFW chose to read it the way they did. I had to muck around in DOS once in awhile with Windows 3.1 waiting for support for 95, but thought this one was how the OS reported the position.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Howell" <s.how...@verizon.net> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 7:39 PM Subject: Re: 3 features that hmm? > > Come on this is crazy. You just can't imagine the number of people who > bitched and complained about this whole editing issue and I believe > Apple was taken to task by one of the rags put out by the NFB or some > organization about the editing issue. APparently enough people > complained that Apple was trying to provide the flexibility for those > users who need it. Yeah, I am one of the Scotts who made this point > because I remember clearly the noise about this editing issue. I see > no benefit in removing it and quite frankly since it's here, whatever > at this point. If it really helps someone , fine because there are > those who would simply not consider the Mac for this reason. It is an > option and not a default and that is why it's a feature not worth > removing. My point is you have to think beyond what you have stated > and I don't entirely disagree with your point of what is or is not a > standard way of editing etc. At the same time, it obviously didn't > take a great deal of effort to implement it and at least it is an > option. > On Aug 29, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Scott Chesworth wrote: > >> >> Also just my oppinion, but I disagree about points 1 and 2. >> >> Can't say I ever have used feature numero uno in any OS as there are >> so few webpages I'd actually want to read 100% of their content, but >> someone somewhere will find it useful. You could argue that the >> reading webpages automatically is as close as Apple could get to a >> sighted person glancing at the screen when the page comes up and >> taking in the bigger picture, which we can't do. >> >> Voiceover hints are definitely useful and a good thing. Context >> sensitive help like that enables most people to be on a way shorter >> learning curve usually than reading a whole manual and trying to apply >> things to a ton of situations at once. It's annoying that they're >> enabled by default for you or I perhaps, but newbies are going to >> thank Apple for it no doubt. Come to that, so will developers who >> fire up VO for the first time when they receive a disgruntled email >> from someone who's asking them to make adjustments to their >> applications. It'll instantly demonstrate to them the difference >> between what works and what doesn't, it gives them instructions >> equally as precise as that email from the VI user would in most cases. >> >> Wholeheartedly agreed about point 3 though. I just don't get this >> one. You also hit the nail right on the head with the reason the >> option shouldn't exist, it modifies a standard that doesn't in any way >> need to be modified, purely because of some VI people's rut that >> they're firmly jammed into. To add weight to a big sweeping oppinion >> like that, I should say that I was raised on Windows, still use >> Windows more often than many on here I expect, and I make my fair >> share of mistakes editing in Mac OS if I haven't done any in a while. >> I don't see this option as the solution, I see it as cheating. I >> doubt that many people will see this as an option to ease their >> progression into Mac OS as one of the other Scott's suggested, human's >> just don't work that way, for the most part we're creatures of habit >> even if they're bad ones. >> >> Tricky one though isn't it. Emailing Apple and asking that a feature >> be removed seems somehow wrong in my mind. In any case, I'm not sure >> they'd get it. I just tried to explain why I disagree with the >> feature and what's potentially at stake here to a sighted mac user, >> and she point blank didn't get it. I'm not sure that anyone who >> hasn't had to appreciate how cool mainstream technology that works for >> us out of the box would, even Apple themselves might not, they >> probably see the introduction of this feature as the best thing they >> could've done to silence a lot of whinging lol. >> >> Just my 2 cents, or perhaps pennies worth for those on this side of >> the pond... >> Scott >> >> On 8/29/09, Scott Howell <s.how...@verizon.net> wrote: >>> >>> Well good for you, I'm glad you did not need these features and you >>> learned the way we all started out. However, of course the only plus >>> side is that for those who want to make the transition and really >>> find >>> what we "grew up with" difficult, will at least have a way to ease >>> their transition over from the dark side. :) So, I agree with you, >>> but these are small prices to pay if it will truly help someone make >>> the transition. >>> >>> On Aug 29, 2009, at 6:17 PM, Marie Howarth wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> well, this is purely my opinion but 3 features that horribly >>>> remind me >>>> of windows are as follows. >>>> 1. automatic reading of a webpage. >>>> 2. voice over hints. I know what to do in a text area, especially >>>> when >>>> it already says edit text. >>>> 3. insertion point. this has been discussed, it's counter intuitive >>>> and doesn't teach the vi community how it would look to sighties. >>>> >>>> all I can say is I'm so glad these features are optional. they are >>>> just horrific and no one can tell me that it will help progression >>>> from windows to mac. I didn't have these features and I am so glad I >>>> did. mac is not windows, when will people realise this. >>>> >>>> overall vo rocks even more in this version, and I am grateful to >>>> apple >>>> for giving us a choice. really glad. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
