I am able to use numbers to enter data, do functions like sums, and read 
spreadsheets.  I don't really know much about excel and jaws, but I'm not 
willing to pay the $1000 to get jaws, when numbers works well.  I use it for my 
personal budgett, as well as a statistics class I'm taking this semester.  If 
office becomes accessible, I will certainly consider purchasing that, because I 
feel that it would make it easier to use my mac for employment purposes, but in 
the meantime I'm doing fine with iWork 09.
Olivia
"Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower",  Steve Jobs

On Apr 22, 2010, at 6:56 AM, peter Apgar wrote:

> I would have to agree.  Mac's spread sheath software doesn't hold a candle
> to excel.  I have problems similar to ones previously listed in this thread
> with searches.    As for formulas I have had issues with complex reference
> formulas.  I will also note that many of my problems with the Mac are a
> result of not being able to spend enough time with the different programs.
> My job requires complex tasks with excel and those are often transferable to
> my personal life with budgeting payment calculations ect.  The largest
> hurdle to using the Mac is weather or not you can incorporate it to your
> employment.  If this is the case there is not a better system out there.  If
> your  required to operate windows  and many of the MS programs the
> transition can be a killer.  Bring on MS office in Coco.  Sorry for the
> rant.
> 
> Pete
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Roy
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 11:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: the apple user?
> 
> Buddy:
> 
> yes, I did try tables, and, yes, it will read the contents of a cell,
> however, I had 1 heck of a time with it reading formulas, the type of column
> I was in etc.  Also, I could find no easy way to have it read the row and
> column at the same time.  yes, it's somewhat usable in a pinch.  However,
> unfortunately, nothing like jaws and Excel.  I wish it was different, and,
> it could be that I am not knowledgeable enough to get it going as well as I
> should.  If you have suggestions, I am listening with vary open ears, grins!
> 
> 
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Buddy Brannan wrote:
> 
>> Have you tried tables? 
>> --
>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
>> Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 8:15 AM, Dan Roy wrote:
>> 
>>> I love my Mac and would never go back to using windows as my main
> machine.  However,the point about spreadsheets is, unfortunately, a good 1.
> I am forced to use windows for spreadsheet work, for now anyway!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 3:38 AM, Dónal Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>> 
>>>> good morning Denise,
>>>> 
>>>> I would agree with the others who have replied to this thread stating
> that the Mac can be used as a productivity tool.  I am a University
> professor (in the American sense of that word rather than the Uk/Irish
> meaning) which means I must use my mac to write papers, grade student exams
> and to carry out other functions.  However, I have not totally abandoned my
> Dell.  While the word processor in iWork 09 is accessible, I don't like
> either the Numbers spreadsheet application or indeed the access provided by
> VO.  It's just an opinion, and no doubt the zealots on this list will
> vehemently disagree, but I still believe that the browsing of spreadsheets
> using Jaws is unparallelled.  Vo lacks the kinds of semantic access to this
> kind of data that Jaws/Excel provide.  
>>>> 
>>>> I would particularly agree with the comment which said "preview" is a
> lovely PDF reader, however it has given me problems when used in full-screen
> mode.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> 
>>>> Dónal
>>>> On 21 Apr 2010, at 01:23, denise avant wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes. Particularly since I am a lawyer with the public defenders 
>>>>> office. And my primary role as an appellate and post-conviction 
>>>>> attorney is to write briefs, with case citations.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I knew about the fusion program, as I have spent time talking to 
>>>>> others about the program. I didn't know about the snap shot.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: [email protected] 
>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John J Herzog
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 7:14 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: the apple user?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> As a macbook user, who has to write substantial papers for law 
>>>>> school, and who has used his computer at a summer internship with 
>>>>> Pepsico, I feel I can helpfully answer your questions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Forgive the length of this email. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> First, the idea that macs are only play toys is complete and utter
> nonsense.
>>>>> On my mac, I do use the apps like Itunes and Ichat, but I use 
>>>>> serious apps as well. Iwork is quite accessible, as is text edit, 
>>>>> allowing you to do extensive formatting of documents. Also, the 
>>>>> preview application on the mac is one of the best PDF readers I 
>>>>> have ever seen. The text is readable with voiceover, and there are 
>>>>> few, if any crashes. What other screen readers can you say that about?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Next, I will address your concern about microsoft office 
>>>>> applications not being accessible. It is true that they do not work 
>>>>> with voiceover. However, for about seventy dollars, you can pick up a
> program called VMware fusion.
>>>>> Fusion allows you to install windows and run it at the same time as 
>>>>> your mac. This means that you can use whatever screen reader you 
>>>>> like for windows and run office without a hitch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There is one more upside to running fusion on mac. After you have 
>>>>> configured windows just the way you want it, you can create what is 
>>>>> known as a snapshot. The snapshot will restore your system to its 
>>>>> exact configuration at the time you took it, meaning you will 
>>>>> always have a fresh install of windows, office, and your screen 
>>>>> reader a click away. It's awesome, because it does a complete and 
>>>>> utter system restore when windows decides to go south on you. For a 
>>>>> blind person, I actually think a mac with fusion is better than a 
>>>>> standard windows PC for this reason. Note that a fusion snapshot 
>>>>> literally restores all files and settings to the way they were when 
>>>>> you took it. It is much more extensive than using the built in 
>>>>> windows system restore utility. It has saved my skin a number of times,
> and I will give you a perfect example.
>>>>> 
>>>>> At the beginning of law school, I found it necessary to purchase a 
>>>>> scanner with a document feeder. Previously, I had a different 
>>>>> scanner that I was using with kurzweil 1000. Now, when I installed 
>>>>> the twain drivers for the new scanner, after trying to 
>>>>> unsuccessfully remove the old drivers, I found myself in a 
>>>>> situation where neither set worked. If I had a standard windows 
>>>>> machine, I was facing the real possibility of having to reinstall 
>>>>> windows to get either unit to work reliably. Either that, or it was 
>>>>> having to spend hours and hours messing with system dll files, and we
> all know what happens after that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, instead, I just restored a snapshot I made of my XP machine 
>>>>> prior to having installed either Kurzweil or the scanner software. 
>>>>> I then installed both on what was essentially a fresh copy of 
>>>>> windows, and all was smooth sailing from there. It saved me from 
>>>>> endless headaches, plus the burden of having to get a sighted 
>>>>> person to help install the screen reader again, and the time that would
> have been wasted in such a pursuit.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I hope this helps answer your questions. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> John
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> P.S. If you go to www.blindcooltech.com, you can find some 
>>>>> excellent demos of the macintosh by Mike Arigo. He even shows how 
>>>>> fusion and voiceover work, and he runs window eyes on the XP side of
> things.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hope this helps. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 20, 2010, at 7:52 PM, denise avant wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please forgive the length of this message.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In researching the issue of whether to purchase an apple mac or 
>>>>> not, I've come across a few people who have expressed criticism if 
>>>>> not concern about the mac computers themselves. I own the iphone, 
>>>>> and have enjoyed it tremendously. I've been able to do things with 
>>>>> the phone I was never able to do with other phones. The only 
>>>>> problem I still have is putting in extensions and account numbers once
> the number is connected.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But having said this, I seriously doubt whether I will ever buy 
>>>>> another phone, where I don't have accessibility built in.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There is an applestoe here in Chicago, and when I've had any 
>>>>> problem of any kind, the sales staff has been very easy to deal with.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Even when I call on the telephone, I find a very friendly staff.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have my own personal sales representative since I have mac book 
>>>>> pro on the drawing board.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What I enjoy most of all, is that I can go to an appelstore, and 
>>>>> with the exception of a couple of products, there is accessibility 
>>>>> right out of the box, with no extra costs or smas to worry about.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm seeking opinions from those of you who use these computers with 
>>>>> voice over. The biggest criticism I've heard that if you're 
>>>>> conducting a business or doing a serious project, the mac is not 
>>>>> for the blind user. This apparently has to do with the fact that 
>>>>> the office aps are not accessible with vo, and iwork9 acts strangely
> sometimes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Basically, one person, who doesn't use the mac, but is familiar 
>>>>> with the product line, told me that the operating system was those 
>>>>> who wanted to "play."
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can those you have used the macbooks or other appel operating 
>>>>> systems address these issues. Thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
>>>>> signature database 5045 (20100420) __________
>>>>> 
>>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
>>>>> signature database 5045 (20100420) __________
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to