On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:55:54 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  In general, I think that
> offline
> mode is going to disappear pretty soon as more and more people are
> permanently connected to the net so I don't worry too much about it even
> though, again, I do realize that this is a very useful thing for some
> users.

my alternative for "offline" mode: i run exim & courier on my laptop, and
when i'm offline, exim is told to queue outbound mail and wait. when ever i
hook up, i launch a queue runner to clear the queues.
 
> RW> > b. It does not have a .newsrc use functionality. 
> RW> 
> RW> the third thing i noticed

>  It should... I don't remember the details but c-client/nntp.c does
> contain
> code to read .newsrc. As everything else in c-client it is probably hard
> coded and so would need some patching to make it useful however :-(

ok, what i actually noticed was lack of a facility for tracking which
messages i read, which i mentally extrapolated into "nothing like newsrc"
for keeping track of messages.
 
> RW> i like some of the GUI for the left side bookmarks pane in
> RW> version 7.x of Opera, and maybe it should be looked at as an example
> for
> RW> possible futures for mahogany.
 
>  What does it do? Any screenshots?

there is a default "tree mode" which looks much like the current layout.
there are two other options available, of which i found split view very
nice (before i gave up on the current opera because it crashed all the
time.) 

with split view, the left side is divided into two panes. the upper shows a
piece of the tree, the lower shows the leaf nodes in the selected node of
the tree from the upper pane.

the other thing that is nice is that the order items are displayed in using
split view is selectable; you can order them yourself or you can let it use
alpha. i'd think for a mail/newsreader you might also consider allowing
ordering by status (contains unread, contains flagged, etc.)
 
>  Its NNTP support is minimal but I think the best way to improve it would
> be to improve nntp.c (c-client NNTP driver) rather than writing our own
> protocol implementation from scratch. We've invested too much into
> c-client
> by now to even consider abandoning it...

that's fine. my time is short enough that gratuitously pitching code and
replacing it isn't on my agenda.

richard
-- 
Richard Welty                                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Averill Park Networking                                         518-573-7592
    Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers

Reply via email to