> Just because you should by default accept mail from everyone > *unless* the sender proved to be nasty/harmful/mailicious etc.?
what if the look quite plausibly harmful? > Otherwise you are breaking the very purpose of e-mail. surely the purpose depends on the user? different people will have different expectations and ideas > Well, Gmail is basically "free stuff" as well. Yahoo is "free > stuff". In my country, Onet, WP and Interia are big free e-mail > providers as well. Should nobody accept mail from them just because > they are free? gmail is not free _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
