>Thanks Dave, > >I haven't really been reading much of this thread I'm afraid but >reading your reply here I counldn't help but agree with every word. > >I thought I would just say (for the record!) > >John Excellent! Including this too? >> But the reality is that in >> this whole century capitalism has been objectively ripe for >> revolution, and it was the Bolsheviks, particularly Lenin and Trotsky >> who developed marxism beyond Eurocentric menshevism to take >> advantage of that reality. Trotsky too?? Cheers, Hugh --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
- Re: M-TH: China and LOV Hugh Rodwell
- Re: M-TH: Meszaros article: "Communism Is No Ut... J.WALKER
- Re: M-TH: China and LOV Dave Bedggood
- Re: M-TH: China and LOV J.WALKER
- Re: M-TH: China and LOV Rob Schaap
- M-TH: "wouldabeen nice to talk abou... Hugh Rodwell
- Re: M-TH: "wouldabeen nice to ... Rob Schaap
- Re: M-TH: "wouldabeen nice... Rob Schaap
- Re: M-TH: "wouldabeen nice... Rob Schaap
- Re: M-TH: China and LOV Dave Bedggood
- Re: M-TH: Every word? Hugh Rodwell
- Re: M-TH: Every word? J.WALKER
- Re: M-TH: China and LOV Hugh Rodwell
- Re: M-TH: Re:LOV, butterflies and babies J.WALKER
- Re: M-TH: Historical vs Dialectical materialism. Rob Schaap
- M-TH: Show us yer spit... Hugh Rodwell
- Re: M-TH: Show us yer spit... Michael Pugliese
- Re: M-TH: Historical vs Dialectical materialism. Chris Burford
- Re: M-TH: Historical vs Dialectical materialism. J.WALKER
- M-TH: Re: [PEN-L:13501] WTO and value Chris Burford