Crappy plasticy huh? Well take off the spark plug cover, polish the rocker cover
and well, look at that - it looks like 2/3 of a Japanese 1000hp RB26DETT!! except
for the small turbo..

If ya ask me, you can't beat the CA for $/power/value. The FJ20s, a top engine,
but getting a bit old now and hard to find good low K examples. The SR20 has
been recognised as an excellent engine so now they are in high demand so every
dude can then check one in his escort, gemini, corolla, etc. As a result they
are more expensive!

The CA18 is in the middle. People think it's plastic and shit but it ain't.
They have less power than both (~130kW) but still have potential. They have
more technology than an FJ20 and less age. I've been in a couple of CA18det
powered cars and they have power. Sure, they lack the low rpm torque but they
still have a turbo so they honk up the rev scale! If you want a more detailed/specific
rundown of the CA18det I can do that too :)

Andrew, do you think a CA18DET could be stroked with a CA20 crank and then bored
a little aswell? ~2.1l would be nice!

zac

>Listers
>I'm just looking into different engine options, and something I'm trying to

>get some opinions on is whats a better option between the CA18det and a 
>FJ20det, I know more about the FJ, but not so much of the CA, I have been 

>told their crappy plasticy and all, but others tell me they have a lot of 

>potential and are almost as good as an SR, plus their closely matched on the

>kw scale I've read. So anyone got any info and/or personal opinions of the

>two, I myself lean towards the FJ at the moment.  Thanks to those who will

>reply,
>Tim

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to