There are definately pro's and con's for each. Having not driven a car with
a CA I'm probably biased, but I personally like the FJ and have just done
the conversion in my '1600. It makes bullsh*t amounts of power, comes on
very hard and fast from ~3500. Plenty of spares for the FJ are available
and a large amount are now non-genuine, so are cheaper. Plenty of knowledge
around for the FJ (I dare say for the CA too, but I dunno about it). Bloody
strong bottom end. True, good ones are getting harder to find, but I found
one without too much trouble.
my 2c
Wardy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Shakespeare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 3:29 AM
Subject: CA vs. FJ
> Listers
> I'm just looking into different engine options, and something I'm trying
to
> get some opinions on is whats a better option between the CA18det and a
> FJ20det, I know more about the FJ, but not so much of the CA, I have been
> told their crappy plasticy and all, but others tell me they have a lot of
> potential and are almost as good as an SR, plus their closely matched on
the
> kw scale I've read. So anyone got any info and/or personal opinions of the
> two, I myself lean towards the FJ at the moment. Thanks to those who will
> reply,
> Tim
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
