EVERYONE
Just like to say thanks for all those who gave me some input and help on the
subject, its hlped a lot and given me some good insight into both engines
now, and plus I know a lot more about them now. I'm not
%100 certain of my choice yet, but when I am you'll know about it. Thanks
again! cya's
Tim
>From: "ryan ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: CA vs. FJ
>Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 05:36:49 GMT
>
>tim,
>theres definately a lot of competition between these 2 motors but i was
>wondering if u have ever considered the SR20?
>a friend of mine has a nissan gazelle and he has a CA18T and that does
>0-100
>in just under 5secs and previously he had a car with a SR20 and said the SR
>would kill it.
>Also a great thing about the FJ is because its old parts are really easy to
>get incase something goes wrong cos theyve been around for longer.
>the FJ also has more power non turboed than the CA so if ur looking for
>power the FJ is the way i would go.
>well i hope ive helped u out a bit and hope u have good luck in your
>search.
>Ryan
>
>>From: "Errol Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: CA vs. FJ
>>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:39:57 +1000
>>
>>Tim,
>>I think the FJ is a much stronger engine and I would use it if you are
>>looking for all out grunt in a car where the extra engine mass is not
>>important. If the engine is being fitted to one of the lighter body
>>Datsun/Nissans then the CA is a much better option in terms of bang for
>>buck without too much weight to cause handling complications.
>>
>>Dont get me wrong "BOTH ENGINES ARE EXCELLENT!". You need to choose the
>>one
>>best suited to your vehicle mass to maintain some reasonable weight
>>balance
>>between front & rear axle weights.
>>
>>In terms of Kw/Kg engine mass the CA is hard to beat and can be made very
>>reliable. I notice someone else mentioned the resemblance to the RB
>>engines. In fact the GTR valve train components fit straight into the CA
>>engines.
>>
>>So lets open a can of Nissan WHOOP-ASS boys! Yeeeeeeee Haaaaa!
>>
>>Respectfully Yours
>>Feral Errol.
>>
>>
>>----------
>>From: Tim Shakespeare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: CA vs. FJ
>>Date: Thursday, July 20, 2000 3:29
>>
>>Listers
>>I'm just looking into different engine options, and something I'm trying
>>to
>>
>>get some opinions on is whats a better option between the CA18det and a
>>FJ20det, I know more about the FJ, but not so much of the CA, I have been
>>told their crappy plasticy and all, but others tell me they have a lot of
>>potential and are almost as good as an SR, plus their closely matched on
>>the
>>kw scale I've read. So anyone got any info and/or personal opinions of the
>>two, I myself lean towards the FJ at the moment. Thanks to those who will
>>reply,
>>Tim
>>________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>>
>>
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
