that'a good time, compared with your mph, what's been your best mph? not bad 60ft for a 2wd manual, streeties or slicks? go the datto, is this a CA in a 1600?
heath ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam @ Dr Drift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, 5 February 2005 12:10 Subject: Re: 240k halfshafts > I agree with Zac, I completed 1 run with my original shafts..... 12.005 @ > 113 mph, 1.7 60'....... then I let the tyre pressure down trying to get > traction and snapped both the shaft in the diff.... > > Hoping for a low 11 when the R200's in there! > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 12:27 PM > Subject: Re: 240k halfshafts > > > > The 1600 shafts have the seperate stubs that go int the diff with the 4 > > bolts and the 240k have the stub off the uni joint.The 1600 shafts will > fit > > using the r180 diff but you need to cut back the steel dust covers.Ive > found > > the 1600 shaft to be slightly stronger than the 240 shaft.Ive never > > completed a pass at the drags using the 240k shaft as they break around > the > > uni at the diff end.I have completed the odd pass with the 1600 shaft. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Zac Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 7:42 AM > > Subject: 240k halfshafts > > > > > > > Hi ozdatters, I have a stack of halfshafts in the shed as spares but I'd > > > like to know how to tell the difference between a 1600 shaft and a 240k > > > shaft. > > > If I were to fit a 240k R180, I would need the 240k shafts too? I > > > presume the 240k shafts are a bit shorter in length. > > > > > > cheers. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005 > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005 > > > > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005 > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005 > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005 --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [email protected] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 3/02/2005
