Agreed. It's better to do it now and not need it than to need it later and not have it.
-- Christopher Tyler MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE Total Highspeed Internet Services 417.851.1107 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> To: "Mikrotik Users" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 1:53:07 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] tower routing suggestion I only install routers. There's only one switch that's outside of my NOC and it's at a micro-POP. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "heith" <[email protected]> To: "Mikrotik Users" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 1:51:25 PM Subject: [Mikrotik Users] tower routing suggestion So trying to plan a routed solution for a part of my network. Basically at the far end of the network I have a rural tower with 33 subs currently with 2 routes into it. I also have another tower 3 miles away in a small town with about the same amount of clients. That 2 nd tower feeds off of the first with no other routes and really no hope of that tower feeding another site. My question is would you install a router at this 2 nd site? Since we are not routed now I cant see a big benefit to it, other than a closer point for auth and traffic shaping, though with 60 plus subs I cant see that being an issue with a good router at the first. Anyways just looking for any insight Thanks Heith _______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users _______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users _______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
