Keeping broadcast traffic off of the backhaul between the towers and the other towers APs.

I would, but I am use to the idea of installing a router at each tower. I actually subnet to the AP, but most of my APs have between 20-30 customers on them so routing a /27 makes it nice and clean.

On 10/20/2014 01:51 PM, heith wrote:

So trying to plan a routed solution for a part of my network. Basically at the far end of the network I have a rural tower with 33 subs currently with 2 routes into it. I also have another tower 3 miles away in a small town with about the same amount of clients. That 2^nd tower feeds off of the first with no other routes and really no hope of that tower feeding another site. My question is would you install a router at this 2^nd site? Since we are not routed now I cant see a big benefit to it, other than a closer point for auth and traffic shaping, though with 60 plus subs I cant see that being an issue with a good router at the first. Anyways just looking for any insight

Thanks

Heith



_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to