Ditto On Oct 20, 2014 2:35 PM, "Sam Tetherow" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Keeping broadcast traffic off of the backhaul between the towers and the > other towers APs. > > I would, but I am use to the idea of installing a router at each tower. > I actually subnet to the AP, but most of my APs have between 20-30 > customers on them so routing a /27 makes it nice and clean. > > On 10/20/2014 01:51 PM, heith wrote: > > So trying to plan a routed solution for a part of my network. Basically > at the far end of the network I have a rural tower with 33 subs currently > with 2 routes into it. I also have another tower 3 miles away in a small > town with about the same amount of clients. That 2nd tower feeds off of > the first with no other routes and really no hope of that tower feeding > another site. My question is would you install a router at this 2nd site? > Since we are not routed now I cant see a big benefit to it, other than a > closer point for auth and traffic shaping, though with 60 plus subs I cant > see that being an issue with a good router at the first. Anyways just > looking for any insight > > > > Thanks > > Heith > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing > [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > >
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
