You could have forced the last three sentences to remain in your
fingers.
On 20 Feb., 22:57, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nom,
> Of course your just as free to go, as we are free to moderate. I just
> want to make clear though, that we have never moderated based on
> content or substance. There are three moderator's on this site, and
> our views differ drastically. I don't think you can find two people
> who have views that differ as drastically as mine and Ian's. You, and
> everyone else are free to talk about anything you want on this site.
> You will only be banned if you attack other members of the group,
> using foul and vulgar language, and change the tone of an open and
> accepting environment. In other words, we are only intolerant of the
> intolerant. ;) (never thought I'd hear that phrase come out of my
> mouth, or at least from my fingers) I understand though if your
> "commitment to free speech" forces you from our group. Its been nice
> having you. You'll be missed.
>
> On Feb 20, 1:49 pm, nominal9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > panache....
> > as usual, when I look back I pick something up.....Kierkecraig.
> > Yes, you do have a nice group going, here, I won't trash or bad-mouth
> > it, some nice people... with one or maybe two exceptions.... Frankly,
> > I haven't seen eye to eye with Chris from the time when he crashed in
> > on me on epistemology... to try to set me straight (in his opinion) as
> > to my language on Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame.... As I said, I
> > know enough to distinguish between Words and Deeds.... and though your
> > words are nice... and your site is polite... well, the deeds are quite
> > dfferent.... like Archytas noted in one post above... sometimes the
> > politeness accompanies some not so congruent acts. As a prospective
> > lawyer, you will probably learn that, if you haven't already. So, I
> > don't think that I will be back here... it would be sort of
> > hypocritical on my part to hang my personal reputation on my
> > commitment and preference for freedom of speech, and then to forsake
> > it on account of some nice words, alone. Hope that you see my point,
> > even if you disagree... if you ever want to engage in some unfettered
> > and actually free conversation, (there are some "things" that can only
> > be learned or known in freedom) maybe you can look me up....
> > nominal9
> > (proprietry quote)
> > I have never met a circle or its diameter but your ass resembles
> > them...Like it or not, your ass stinks.
> > (believe it or not.... that is deeper than it may appear... nothing
> > personal.... it applies to everyone, don't you think?)
>
> > On Feb 20, 10:41 am, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Nom,
> > > My point exactly. I've been on forums as well where people just throw
> > > insults back and forth. It is the mood of those forums, and I have
> > > caught myself being nasty in those forums. It is a matter of the
> > > company you keep, just as you say. It is my goal to keep this forum
> > > from becoming a shouting match. That is why on occasion some have to
> > > be moderated. This is a quiet place for intelligent conversation.
>
> > > > I
> > > > say that I have always and only... "replied in kind" (and usually with
> > > > greater style and pannash) to what I received from others.... those
> > > > others being mostly sysops and moderators. But let that be as it may.
> > > > The road goes both ways... It is a matter (or a question) of the
> > > > company that you keep...
> > > > nominal9- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
