Again, the bigger issue of adults using children.  In this case, both
the girls and the boys are used.

On Apr 10, 8:38 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yet even curiosity gets the better of some Vam, as perhaps in
> curiosity killing the cat.  One hesitates to use the tool metaphor in
> speaking of sex - yet alas even curiosity may line the pathway to
> depravity. I can't reveal full details of what has been happening
> close to me over the last few years - but this includes the use of
> daughters to attract young males to criminal activity through sex with
> them by Fagin-like parents.
>
> On 10 Apr, 05:35, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > " But I can conceive of a much healthier environment where it would
> > possibly be permissible to respond in kind."
>
> > You mean : You need it. I too. Let's do it.
>
> > Instead, I see in the child's need an opportunity to create a healthy
> > perspective of the matter in him, his thought - world, his life,
> > beyond his need of sex and definitely without the least need in me to
> > benefit / satisfy myself from his need of sex.
>
> > Just an alternate view !
>
> > On Apr 9, 11:49 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps it does matter.  Boys and men tend to be more sexually
> > > aggressive than girls and women, though in the adult range of that
> > > aspect, more women are beginning to come out of the timidity closet,
> > > which pleases me to no end.  Or it did back when I was still able.
>
> > > Nor does a child acting out sexually necessarily indicate a sexual
> > > violation or abuse has taken place.  It may simply be a lack of love
> > > in the home that causes that acting out -- though a lack of love can
> > > certainly be considered abuse.  Or it could also be a vivid
> > > imagination.  There are probably a host of reasons a child would act
> > > out sexually, just as there are a host of reasons children act out in
> > > many other ways.
>
> > > As to whether that acting out would justify a response, well, in
> > > today's emotional and irrational mindset many have regarding the
> > > issue, I'd have to say there would be no justified response because it
> > > would do no more than to place the child in the emotional chains of
> > > shame, guilt and despair.  But I can conceive of a much healthier
> > > environment where it would possibly be permissible to respond in
> > > kind.  It just doesn't exist at this time.
>
> > > On Apr 9, 11:03 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > boy or girl, does it matter?  children who act out sexually do so
> > > > because they have been violated in this way.  But as a question of
> > > > morality, would their approach justify any response to it?- Hide quoted 
> > > > text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to